Changes

Jump to navigation Jump to search
→‎'''Against''': Movie Reviews...
Line 52: Line 52:  
::'''Reply''' I don't see how it would prohibit documentaries or movies.  --[[User:TimSvendsen|TimSvendsen]] 19:17, 15 February 2007 (EST)
 
::'''Reply''' I don't see how it would prohibit documentaries or movies.  --[[User:TimSvendsen|TimSvendsen]] 19:17, 15 February 2007 (EST)
 
::: Well then, what precisely are you prohibiting by "no movie or TV show reviews"?[[User:JoshuaZ|JoshuaZ]] 19:57, 15 February 2007 (EST)
 
::: Well then, what precisely are you prohibiting by "no movie or TV show reviews"?[[User:JoshuaZ|JoshuaZ]] 19:57, 15 February 2007 (EST)
 +
::::I mean movie reviews as in: this is a good movie because... or don't see this movie... More Opinionated POV stuff.  I guess I could have been more specific. --[[User:TimSvendsen|TimSvendsen]] 22:57, 15 February 2007 (EST)
 +
 
:3. Count me as against this proposed limitation.  Deletions can always be made later, but at this early stage in the project we want it to be able to grow in many different directions.  Recall the parable about the wheat and the chaff?  Jesus explained that you do not sort the two early, but only at harvest.  No reason to rush to delete and risk stamping out something that might grow and bear fruit.
 
:3. Count me as against this proposed limitation.  Deletions can always be made later, but at this early stage in the project we want it to be able to grow in many different directions.  Recall the parable about the wheat and the chaff?  Jesus explained that you do not sort the two early, but only at harvest.  No reason to rush to delete and risk stamping out something that might grow and bear fruit.
 
:I might add that the [[Bias in Wikipedia]] page does not complain about useless Wikipedia entries.  One (of 22) complaints there criticized Wikipedia's bragging about have so many entries, which the vast majority of its entries are frivilous.  That is a complaint about misleading advertising, not a demand for deletion.  Several complaints about Wikipedia on [[Bias in Wikipedia]] are about speedy and arbitrary deletions, something we want to avoid here.--[[User:Aschlafly|Aschlafly]] 19:45, 15 February 2007 (EST)
 
:I might add that the [[Bias in Wikipedia]] page does not complain about useless Wikipedia entries.  One (of 22) complaints there criticized Wikipedia's bragging about have so many entries, which the vast majority of its entries are frivilous.  That is a complaint about misleading advertising, not a demand for deletion.  Several complaints about Wikipedia on [[Bias in Wikipedia]] are about speedy and arbitrary deletions, something we want to avoid here.--[[User:Aschlafly|Aschlafly]] 19:45, 15 February 2007 (EST)
−
:'''Reply''' The Examples of Bias page has 5 entries attacking Wikipedia for having too much useless Info, (Nos 7, 10, 18, 19 and 22) and only 1 attacking the deletion policy, (No 9) --TimSvendsen 11:59, 15 February 2007 (EST)  
+
:'''Reply''' The Examples of Bias page has 5 entries attacking Wikipedia for having too much useless Info, (Nos 7, 10, 18, 19 and 22) and only 1 attacking the deletion policy, (No 9) --TimSvendsen 11:59, 15 February 2007 (EST)
    
==WWII German Entries==
 
==WWII German Entries==
1,263

edits

Navigation menu