Changes

Line 52: Line 52:     
:::::::I was wondering why they filed a brief, just to say that they were not taking sides.  They mainly talked about Lemon test, which I do not know a great deal about.  It is interesting that this does not affect them, so I wonder why it was brought up.  Probably I just misunderstood the point of their argument.  Still, on page 2, they seem to speak against those contesting Trump's order. I'm a little confused. --[[User:DavidB4|<font color="ForestGreen">David B</font>]] <sup>([[User talk:DavidB4|TALK]])</sup> 23:01, 25 June 2018 (EDT)
 
:::::::I was wondering why they filed a brief, just to say that they were not taking sides.  They mainly talked about Lemon test, which I do not know a great deal about.  It is interesting that this does not affect them, so I wonder why it was brought up.  Probably I just misunderstood the point of their argument.  Still, on page 2, they seem to speak against those contesting Trump's order. I'm a little confused. --[[User:DavidB4|<font color="ForestGreen">David B</font>]] <sup>([[User talk:DavidB4|TALK]])</sup> 23:01, 25 June 2018 (EDT)
 +
 +
::::::::You didn't misunderstand.  ADF's brief is confused because they are influenced by [[Never Trump movement|NeverTrumpers]].  You're right:  "why [did] they file[] a brief, just to say that they were not taking sides."  It's unhelpful.  We'll see the outcome soon, maybe in less than 9 hours (but more likely later this week when the Supreme Court holds its final day of its Term).--[[User:Aschlafly|Andy Schlafly]] ([[User talk:Aschlafly|talk]]) 01:11, 26 June 2018 (EDT)
Anthony, Irenaeus, Siteadmin, apieditor, Bureaucrats, Check users, nsAm_Govt_101RO, nsAm_Govt_101RW, nsAm_Govt_101_ta, nsJudgesRO, nsJudgesRW, nsJudges_talkRO, nsJudges_talkRW, nsTeam2RO, nsTeam2RW, nsTeam2_talkRO, nsTeam2_talkRW, oversight, Administrators
126,530

edits