Difference between revisions of "Talk:Prokaryotes"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
(New page: I think some of this is slightly outdated. Archaea are not now regarded as prokaryotes but as a separate domain on their own. And cyanobacteria are classed as archaea, not prokaryotes. ~...) |
|||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
I think some of this is slightly outdated. Archaea are not now regarded as prokaryotes but as a separate domain on their own. And cyanobacteria are classed as archaea, not prokaryotes. [[User:Aloysius|Aloysius]] 11:36, 4 May 2007 (EDT) | I think some of this is slightly outdated. Archaea are not now regarded as prokaryotes but as a separate domain on their own. And cyanobacteria are classed as archaea, not prokaryotes. [[User:Aloysius|Aloysius]] 11:36, 4 May 2007 (EDT) | ||
| + | |||
| + | It has been many years since I had any microbiology so feel free to update it. I can work on the molecular side.--[[User:Tims|TimS]] 13:59, 4 May 2007 (EDT) | ||
Revision as of 17:59, May 4, 2007
I think some of this is slightly outdated. Archaea are not now regarded as prokaryotes but as a separate domain on their own. And cyanobacteria are classed as archaea, not prokaryotes. Aloysius 11:36, 4 May 2007 (EDT)
It has been many years since I had any microbiology so feel free to update it. I can work on the molecular side.--TimS 13:59, 4 May 2007 (EDT)