Difference between revisions of "Template:Science and motivation"
From Conservapedia
(It's not what motivates a scientist's argument that determines its validity; it's the quality of the evidence and analysis that the scientist uses to support the argument.) |
DavidB4-bot (Talk | contribs) (→References: HTTPS/HTTP) |
||
| (6 intermediate revisions by 5 users not shown) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
| − | It's not what motivates a scientist's argument that determines its validity; it's the quality of the evidence and analysis that the scientist uses to support the argument. [http://www.discovery.org/scripts/viewDB/filesDB-download.php?id=349] | + | It's not what motivates a scientist's [[argument]] that determines its validity; it's the quality of the [[evidence]] and [[analysis]] that the [[scientist]] uses to support the argument. <ref>[http://www.discovery.org/scripts/viewDB/filesDB-download.php?id=349 Stephen Meyer]</ref><noinclude> |
| + | ==References== | ||
| + | <references /></noinclude> | ||
| + | [[Category:Template quotes]] | ||
Latest revision as of 23:11, September 10, 2018
It's not what motivates a scientist's argument that determines its validity; it's the quality of the evidence and analysis that the scientist uses to support the argument. [1]
