Difference between revisions of "User talk:Logician"
m (→Your edits) |
|||
| Line 9: | Line 9: | ||
Thanks. --[[User:1990'sguy|1990'sguy]] ([[User talk:1990'sguy|talk]]) 18:52, 24 September 2018 (EDT) | Thanks. --[[User:1990'sguy|1990'sguy]] ([[User talk:1990'sguy|talk]]) 18:52, 24 September 2018 (EDT) | ||
| − | :I cleaned up the article. I didn't remove content that was good, I just cleaned up the stuff that... wasn't (e.g. "institutional logic", which isn't even logic in the sense of this article). I removed "refers to undeniable truth" because that proposition is false. ''Deductive'' logic when the argument is valid and sound refers to undeniable truth. Logic as an academic field does not (certainly inductive and abductive arguments are not "undeniable truths"). | + | :I cleaned up the article. I didn't remove content that was good, I just cleaned up the stuff that... wasn't (e.g. "institutional logic", which isn't even logic in the sense of this article). I removed "refers to undeniable truth" because that proposition is false. ''Deductive'' logic when the argument is valid and sound refers to undeniable truth. Logic as an academic field does not (certainly inductive and abductive arguments are not "undeniable truths"). I can create a page with all removed content if you so desire. |
:With regards to the second article: I'll add explanations for the laypeople, but the example before with "I'm wearing red shoes" I think it was and "Obama is a competent president" was confusing and a terrible example of the principle of explosion. In addition to all of this, I'll try to keep edits shorter. [[User:Logician|Logician]] ([[User talk:Logician|talk]]) 19:00, 24 September 2018 (EDT) | :With regards to the second article: I'll add explanations for the laypeople, but the example before with "I'm wearing red shoes" I think it was and "Obama is a competent president" was confusing and a terrible example of the principle of explosion. In addition to all of this, I'll try to keep edits shorter. [[User:Logician|Logician]] ([[User talk:Logician|talk]]) 19:00, 24 September 2018 (EDT) | ||
Revision as of 23:02, September 24, 2018
Welcome!
Hello, Logician, and welcome to Conservapedia!
We're glad you are here to edit. We ask that you read our Editor's Guide before you edit.
At the right are some useful links for you. You can include these links on your user page by putting "{{Useful links}}" on the page. Any questions--ask!
Thanks for reading, Logician!
Your edits
Thanks for your edits.
The problem with this one is that you made numerous major/massive changes all in one edit. The diff is confusing. Rather than simply reverting it all, I am giving you the chance to clarify your edit. Also, what information, exactly, did you remove in that edit? It's unclear. In addition, please explain why you removed "refers to undeniable truth" in the first paragraph.
Regarding this edit, you removed an example that laypeople can understand and replaced it with something most readers won't understand. I support including both -- for the laypeople and for the more knowledgeable people, but you replaced one with the other. I would re-add what you removed, but I'm giving you the chance to do that.
Thanks. --1990'sguy (talk) 18:52, 24 September 2018 (EDT)
- I cleaned up the article. I didn't remove content that was good, I just cleaned up the stuff that... wasn't (e.g. "institutional logic", which isn't even logic in the sense of this article). I removed "refers to undeniable truth" because that proposition is false. Deductive logic when the argument is valid and sound refers to undeniable truth. Logic as an academic field does not (certainly inductive and abductive arguments are not "undeniable truths"). I can create a page with all removed content if you so desire.
- With regards to the second article: I'll add explanations for the laypeople, but the example before with "I'm wearing red shoes" I think it was and "Obama is a competent president" was confusing and a terrible example of the principle of explosion. In addition to all of this, I'll try to keep edits shorter. Logician (talk) 19:00, 24 September 2018 (EDT)