Changes

Jump to navigation Jump to search
78 bytes added ,  13:17, September 26, 2018
m
→‎Conservative Veterans, Patriots, Gun Enthusiasts and Preppers See Police State Behaviors: HTTP --> HTTPS [#1], replaced: http://hotair.com → https://hotair.com (2)
Line 1: Line 1: −
'''Ammunition control''' is [[progressive]] [[police state]] [[gun control|gun grabbing]] [[legislation]] that seeks to track, [[surveillance|monitor]] and [[gun control|control]] the [[private property|ownership]] and use of [[firearm]]s by [[law]]-abiding peaceable [[citizen]]s by requiring mandatory tracking and monitoring of [[ammunition]] sales by both the [[retail]]er and the [[Department of Justice]] in centralized databases.  
+
'''Ammunition control''' is [[progressive]] [[police state]] gun grabbing [[legislation]] that seeks to track, [[surveillance|monitor]] and control the [[private property|ownership]] and use of [[firearm]]s by [[law]]-abiding peaceable [[citizen]]s by requiring mandatory tracking and monitoring of [[ammunition]] sales by both the [[retail]]er and the [[Department of Justice]] in centralized databases.  
    
==Conservative Veterans, Patriots, Gun Enthusiasts and Preppers See Police State Behaviors==
 
==Conservative Veterans, Patriots, Gun Enthusiasts and Preppers See Police State Behaviors==
−
Many [[Conservative]] [[veteran]]s, [[American]] [[Oath Keepers|Oath Keeper]] [[Patriot]]s, [[gun enthusiast]]s and [[:Category:Survivalists|preppers]] see the ammunition control and [[gun control]] in general as [[tyranny|tyrannical]] [[police state]] behaviors.
+
Many [[Conservative]] [[veteran]]s, [[American]] [[Oath Keepers|Oath Keeper]] [[Patriot]]s, [[gun enthusiast]]s and [[:Category:Survivalists|preppers]] see the ammunition control and [[gun control]] in general as [[tyranny|tyrannical]] police state behaviors.
   −
Ammunition control, at least as it was attempted both in 2010 and again in 2014 by [[left coast]] [[California]] [[Democrat]]s, would:
+
Ammunition control, at least as it was attempted both in 2010 and again in 2014 by [[Left Coast]] [[California]] [[Democrat]]s, would:
    
* Require all ammunition to only be sold by [[FFL]] (Federal Firearms Licensees) controlled by the [[Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms and Explosives]].  
 
* Require all ammunition to only be sold by [[FFL]] (Federal Firearms Licensees) controlled by the [[Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms and Explosives]].  
Line 10: Line 10:  
* Ban all loaning or gifting of ammunition to a friend, colleague or family member, even in an emergency such as [[home security]] for [[self-defense]] during an active [[shooting|shooter]] [[home invasion]].  
 
* Ban all loaning or gifting of ammunition to a friend, colleague or family member, even in an emergency such as [[home security]] for [[self-defense]] during an active [[shooting|shooter]] [[home invasion]].  
   −
* Ban [[handloading]] of ammunition by [[gun enthusiasts]] and law abiding [[citizen]]s in general.  
+
* Ban [[handloading]] of ammunition by gun enthusiasts and law abiding [[citizen]]s in general.  
    
* Require an ammunition purchase [[license]] with mandatory background check for each purchase creating a large new police state [[bureaucracy]] including greatly slow down purchases at retailers, many of whom would simple stop selling ammunition.  
 
* Require an ammunition purchase [[license]] with mandatory background check for each purchase creating a large new police state [[bureaucracy]] including greatly slow down purchases at retailers, many of whom would simple stop selling ammunition.  
   −
* Ban all [[internet]]-based sales of ammunition by online retailers such as [[Cheaper Than Dirt]]. Interestingly, the Democrats re-added this provision to the 2014 ammunition control bill even though it was declared [[unconstitutional]] by the California [[Supreme Court]]. This would have cost the taxpayers and the [[NRA]], [[Gun Owners of California]] and the [[Second Amendment Foundation]] a lot of money re-defending this issue in the court system.
+
* Ban all [[internet]]-based sales of ammunition by online retailers such as [[Cheaper Than Dirt]]. Interestingly, the Democrats re-added this provision to the 2014 ammunition control bill even though it was declared [[unconstitutional]] by the California [[Supreme Court]]. This would have cost the taxpayers and the [[NRA]], [[Gun Owners of America]] and the [[Second Amendment Foundation]] a lot of money re-defending this issue in the court system.
   −
Despite passing almost unanimously in the [[left-wing]] [[Democrat]] controlled California State [[Legislature]], it was surprisingly vetoed by [[elitist]] [[liberal]] [[gun enthusiast|gun collector]] [[Governor]] [[Jerry Brown]] in 2014. Governor Brown has a long history of voting for, supporting, and as governor in the 1970s and 21st century, signing gun control legislation despite himself being a gun collector. Governor Brown said on his veto that ammunition control would do little to stop crime.  
+
If ammunition control had passed in California, as it did in the gun-grabbing, high crime, liberal bastion of [[Chicago]], California would have been the first state to pass such draconian law. It wouldn't have been long before the other most of the current 16 unfree states (such as [[Massachusetts]], [[New York]], [[New Jersey]], [[Illinois]], [[Maryland]] and [[Colorado]]) tend to follow the trend-setting California when it comes to liberal [[nanny state]] legislation.
   −
The ammunition control bill was originally sponsored by [[gun control|gun grabbing]] [[Leeland Yee]], the [[corruption|corrupt]] leftist Asian-American [[San Francisco values|San Francisco]] state [[senator]] who is now in [[prison]] for being involved with bribery and gun running of [[assault rifle]]s with [[Chinese]] [[gang]]s. Yee had strongly supported the banning of so-called [[assault weapon]]s including the [[bullet button]] on [[AR-15]]s and [[AK-47]]s.
+
Despite passing almost unanimously in the [[left-wing]] [[Democrat]] controlled California State [[Legislature]], it was surprisingly vetoed by [[elitist]] [[liberal]] gun collector [[Governor]] [[Jerry Brown]] in 2014. Governor Brown has a long history of voting for, supporting, and as governor in the 1970s and 21st century, signing gun control legislation despite himself being a gun collector. Governor Brown said on his veto that ammunition control would do little to stop crime.
 +
 
 +
The ammunition control bill was originally sponsored by gun grabbing [[Leland Yee]],<ref>[https://hotair.com/archives/2014/03/27/we-hardly-knew-yee We hardly knew Yee], Accessed January 14, 2015</ref> the [[corruption|corrupt]] leftist Asian-American [[San Francisco values|San Francisco]] state [[senator]] who is now in [[prison]] for being involved with bribery, drug trafficking and gun running of [[assault rifle]]s with [[Chinese]] [[gang]]s.<ref>https://hotair.com/archives/2014/03/27/we-hardly-knew-yee Accessed March 28, 2014</ref> Yee had sponsored and strongly supported legislation banning ''all'' [[semi-automatic]] [[rifle]]s (leaving only [[bolt-action]] [[hunting]] rifles left for [[home defense]]) especially the [[AR-15]] and even the diminutive [[Ruger 10/22]]. When that failed he and most California Democrat legislators attempted to reinstate the 1994 to 2004 [[Clinton Administration]] so-called [[Assault weapons ban]]. When that failed Lee attempted to ban the [[bullet button]] on [[AR-15]]s and [[AK-47]]s.
    
==Criminals by Nature Never Follow Laws==
 
==Criminals by Nature Never Follow Laws==
−
Ammunition control, gun control and [[gun free zone]]s have always been absurd [[left wing]] "[[unicorn]] [[utopia]]" [[pollyanna]] [[fantasy|fantasies]] of the [[:Essay:Anti-self-defense movement|Anti-self-defense movement]], for the simple reason that [[criminal]]s by their nature ''never'' follow laws.  
+
Ammunition control, gun control and [[gun free zone]]s have always been absurd [[left wing]] "[[unicorn]] [[utopia]]" [[wishful thinking]] [[pollyanna]] [[fantasy|fantasies]] of the [[:Essay:Anti-self-defense movement|Anti-self-defense movement]], for the simple reason that [[criminal]]s by their nature ''never'' follow laws.  
   −
A huge campaign of [[propaganda|disinformation]] on guns is pushed daily on our TVs and Internet devices. It has nothing to do with [[:Category:Safety|public safety]] or preventing [[young mass murderers|mass shootings]] of innocent people. No law against "guns and ammo" would have stopped the [[evil]] [[Muslim]] [[Jidadist|jihad]] [[terrorist]]s murder 12 people at the [[gun free zone]] in [[Paris]] at [[Charlie Hebdo]] or [[Adam Lanza]] at [[Sandy Hook]] Elementary school – [[violence|violent]] [[crime|criminal]]s will always break laws and be violent with all kinds of devices – they don't need guns (as evidenced by the high amount of knife crime and knife murders in "gun free" [[United Kingdom]] and [[Australia]]).  
+
A huge campaign of [[propaganda|disinformation]] on guns is pushed daily on our TVs and Internet devices. It has nothing to do with [[:Category:Safety|public safety]] or preventing [[young mass murderers|mass shootings]] of innocent people. No law against "guns and ammo" would have stopped the [[evil]] [[Islam]]ic [[Jidadist|jihad]] [[terrorist]]s from murdering 12 people at the [[gun free zone]] in [[Paris]] at ''[[Charlie Hebdo]]'' or [[Adam Lanza]] at [[Sandy Hook]] Elementary school – [[violence|violent]] [[crime|criminal]]s will always break laws and be violent with all kinds of devices – they don't need guns (as evidenced by the high amount of knife crime and knife murders in "gun free" [[United Kingdom]] and [[Australia]]).  
   −
[[Thomas Jefferson]] said, "Laws that forbid the carrying of arms...disarm only those who are [[citizen|neither inclined nor determined to commit crimes]]... Such laws make things worse for the [[victim|assaulted]] and better for the [[criminal|assailants]]; they serve rather to encourage than to prevent [[murder|homicides]], for an unarmed man may be attacked with greater confidence than an armed man.”
+
[[Thomas Jefferson]] said, "Laws that forbid the carrying of arms...disarm only those who are [[citizen|neither inclined nor determined to commit crimes]]... Such laws make things worse for the [[victim|assaulted]] and better for the [[criminal|assailants]]; they serve rather to encourage than to prevent [[murder|homicides]], for an unarmed man may be attacked with greater confidence than an armed man."
    
If we truly wish to increase public safety, then we should make laws whereby immediate [[self-defense|armed responses]] by good civilians are allowed and encouraged – now that will save our children and stop these senseless massacres by madmen. President [[James Monroe]] said on November 16, 1818, "The right of [[self-defense]] never ceases. It is among the most sacred, and alike necessary to nations and to individuals."  
 
If we truly wish to increase public safety, then we should make laws whereby immediate [[self-defense|armed responses]] by good civilians are allowed and encouraged – now that will save our children and stop these senseless massacres by madmen. President [[James Monroe]] said on November 16, 1818, "The right of [[self-defense]] never ceases. It is among the most sacred, and alike necessary to nations and to individuals."  
Line 31: Line 33:  
Jefferson said, "The [[constitution]]s of most of our [[State]]s assert that all power is inherent in the [[citizen|people]]; that... it is their right and duty to be at all times armed;..." (Thomas Jefferson letter to Justice John Cartwright of the [[Supreme Court]], June 5, 1824. 1824. ME 16:45).
 
Jefferson said, "The [[constitution]]s of most of our [[State]]s assert that all power is inherent in the [[citizen|people]]; that... it is their right and duty to be at all times armed;..." (Thomas Jefferson letter to Justice John Cartwright of the [[Supreme Court]], June 5, 1824. 1824. ME 16:45).
   −
No, this [[progressive]] [[police state]] "[[gun control|gun grabbing]]" movement is more ominous in nature, and it ties into an alarming political change in the United States – the exact kind our wise [[Founding Fathers]] worried about. "To disarm the people [is] the best and most effectual way to [[slave|enslave]] them…" ([[George Mason]], 3 Elliot, Debates at 380, June 14, 1788)
+
No, this [[progressive]] police state "gun grabbing" movement is more [[Communism|ominous]] in nature, and it ties into an alarming political change in the United States – the exact kind our wise [[Founding Fathers]] worried about. "To disarm the people [is] the best and most effectual way to [[slavery|enslave]] them…" ([[George Mason]], 3 Elliot, Debates at 380, June 14, 1788)
    
==Unfree States Attempting Ammunition Control==
 
==Unfree States Attempting Ammunition Control==
−
In 2008 there were 18 [[unfree states]] seeking to impose some form of '''ammunition control''' over lawful owners and users of guns:<ref>http://ammunitionaccountability.org/Legislation.htm</ref>
+
In 2008 there were 18 unfree states seeking to impose some form of '''ammunition control''' over lawful owners and users of guns:<ref>http://ammunitionaccountability.org/Legislation.htm</ref>
    
*[[Alabama]]
 
*[[Alabama]]
Line 53: Line 55:  
*[[South Carolina]]
 
*[[South Carolina]]
 
*[[Tennessee]]
 
*[[Tennessee]]
−
*[[Washington]].
+
*[[Washington]]
−
 
  −
 
  −
==See Also==
  −
* [[Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms and Explosives]] as [[Gun control]] agent
  −
* [[Second Amendment|Second Amendment Defenders]]: [[National Rifle Association]], [[Gun Owners of America]], [[Second Amendment Foundation]]
  −
* [[MSSA v. Holder]]: [[Montana]] and [[Second Amendment Foundation]] versus [[Eric Holder]] over [[intrastate]] [[ammunition]] commerce
  −
 
  −
 
  −
==Bibliography - Further Reading==
  −
* [[Boston T. Party|Party, Boston T.]], [[Boston's Gun Bible]]. [[Wyoming]] [[American Redoubt]] [[Javelin Press]], 2008. Contains several chapters related to [[gun control]] and ammunition control
  −
* [[Boston T. Party|Party, Boston T.]], [[Molon Labe!]]. [[Wyoming]] [[American Redoubt]] [[Javelin Press]], 30 January 2004, 454 pp (first edition, paperback), ISBN 1-888766-07-7 - Conservative [[Christian]] [[Libertarian]] [[dystopian]] fiction novel entirely based around the issue of [[States' rights]] and the [[Tenth Amendment]]'s connection with the [[Second Amendment]] right to [[firearms|armed]] [[citizen]] defense against federal [[tyranny]]. Contains several chapters related to the gun control and ammunition control.
        Line 70: Line 61:  
{{reflist|2}}
 
{{reflist|2}}
   −
{{liberalism}}
+
{{Second Amendment topics}}
   −
[[Category : Gun control]]
+
[[Category:Gun Control]]
−
[[Category : Anti Second Amendment]]
+
[[Category:Anti Second Amendment]]
−
[[Category : Second Amendment]]
+
[[Category:United States Political Terms]]
−
[[Category : Oppression]]
+
[[Category:Second Amendment]]
−
[[Category : Communism]]
+
[[Category:Oppression]]
−
[[Category : Socialism]]
+
[[Category:Politics]]
−
[[Category : Marxism]]
+
[[Category:Liberalism]]
−
[[Category : Police State]]
+
[[Category:Communism]]
−
[[Category : Welfare State]]
+
[[Category:Communists]]
 +
[[Category:Socialism]]
 +
[[Category:Socialists]]
 +
[[Category:Marxism]]
 +
[[Category:Police State]]
 +
[[Category:Welfare State]]
 +
[[Category:Professor Values]]
 +
[[Category:Threats]]
 +
[[Category:Man-Made Disasters]]
Block, SkipCaptcha, Automoderated users, Bots, edit
57,719

edits

Navigation menu