Block, SkipCaptcha, Upload, Automoderated users, delete, edit, rollback
7,537
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 132:
Line 132: + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + +
→hi
:Thank you! I hope you and all the other contributors at Conservapedia had also a great Christmas and will have a happy New Year!--[[User:JoeyJ|JoeyJ]] ([[User talk:JoeyJ|talk]]) 15:49, 27 December 2016 (EST)
:Thank you! I hope you and all the other contributors at Conservapedia had also a great Christmas and will have a happy New Year!--[[User:JoeyJ|JoeyJ]] ([[User talk:JoeyJ|talk]]) 15:49, 27 December 2016 (EST)
== IRC ==
Hello,<br />
After some discussion (on [[User_talk:DavidB4#Conservapedia_IRC_channel|my talk page]] and [[User_talk:Aschlafly#IRC|Andy's]]) it has been decided that I start an [[Internet Relay Chat]] channel for Conservapedia, since our old one has been dead since 2009. It is now registered and somewhat set up. I don't know if you use IRC or are interested in doing so, but anyone with block privileges on Conservapedia can also get block privileges on the new IRC channel. Unfortunately, IRC accounts are deleted after 30 days of being unused, so unless you plan on using the IRC at least once a month, there is probably not much point in registering. In any case, feel free to try it out--if you account gets deleted, we can always make another one later. If you are interested, please let me know!<br />
The IRC channel is: #conservapedia @irc.accessIRC.net<br />
Let me know if you have any questions or need anything else, also! --[[User:DavidB4|<font color="ForestGreen">David B</font>]] <sup>([[User talk:DavidB4|TALK]])</sup> 15:42, 11 April 2017 (EDT)
== Svoboda ==
why did you said in this article that my additions were fake News/information. [[User:YortKeldher|YortKeldher]] ([[User talk:YortKeldher|talk]]) 10:03, 21 July 2017 (EDT)
:Because you did not add a source for your claims. When did Tyahnybok gave the Nazi salute? If you are talking about [http://www.globalresearch.ca/there-are-no-neo-nazis-in-the-ukraine-and-the-obama-administration-does-not-support-fascists/5370269 this photo], you should remind that the Nazi salute is given with the right hand. And it could be misleading to call Stepan Bandera a nazi collaborator, because he did not cooperate with the Germans for a long time. In fact, he was interned in a concentration camp for three years. Sorry for the late response.--[[User:JoeyJ|JoeyJ]] ([[User talk:JoeyJ|talk]]) 11:03, 4 August 2017 (EDT)
== Re: You're Cool ==
I did not start the edit war, SamHB did by insistently editing the Pussy Riot article to force his liberal viewpoint on it (which differs from what is actually the case on the article - that liberals and leftists, who generally support anti-Christian bigotry, supported the actions of Pussy Riot) in violation of CP guidelines (his preferred version attempts to whitewash the article to deny that liberal/leftist bigotry and anti-Christian hate, under the ruse of "freedom of speech", motivated both the band's actions and liberal SJW/elitist support of those actions, which basically ''is'' imposing a liberal viewpoint on it). You also should ''not'' have unblocked him because doing so only serves to give him a free pass to continue acting as he has on this site and to enforce to him that he can do as he pleases here without answering for it. [[User:Northwest|Northwest]] ([[User talk:Northwest|talk]]) 14:16, 26 February 2018 (EST)
:Alright, but I still do not comprehend your block of SamHB. You could have explained your opinion on this essay on his talk page, instead of simply reverting his edits. Therefore, you were not less involved in this edit war than SamHB. In my personal opinion the actions of Pussy Riot fall under freedom of speech (which is a Conservative value that differs the USA from such Pseudo-Conservative and Soviet-nostalgic states like Russia).--[[User:JoeyJ|JoeyJ]] ([[User talk:JoeyJ|talk]]) 11:59, 27 February 2018 (EST)
::Well, there is one thing about that, though - liberals have a tendency to "support" freedom of speech only when it's convenient to them. But as we've been seeing in media outlets that are not part of the liberal media, liberals are all too quick to deny freedom of speech to conservatives and frequently (and illegally) use weaponized political offices and courts to do so. By their words and actions, Pussy Riot are by no means "conservative" either, and regardless of whether their actions are covered by freedom of speech or not, they were still intended to offend a religious majority (specifically through blasphemy) and it still doesn't make it right. [[User:Northwest|Northwest]] ([[User talk:Northwest|talk]]) 14:18, 27 February 2018 (EST)
==Copyright protection for intellectual property of the Islamic State==
So you are defending the intellectual copyright protections for intellectual property produced by the Islamic State. Now I understand where you're coming from. [[User:RobSmith|RobS]]<sup>[[User talk:RobSmith|''Deep Six the Deep State!'']]</sup> 15:36, 9 June 2018 (EDT)
:I defend the intellectual property of the Reuters news agency.--[[User:JoeyJ|JoeyJ]] ([[User talk:JoeyJ|talk]]) 07:18, 10 June 2018 (EDT)
::Reuters was invited in by the Islamic State to film a mass beheading? Didn't know that. [[User:RobSmith|RobS]]<sup>[[User talk:RobSmith|''Deep Six the Deep State!'']]</sup> 11:20, 10 June 2018 (EDT)
::Are the families of victims of beheadings aware ''Reuters'' are commercially exploiting photographs of their loved ones murders, and demand payment? [[User:RobSmith|RobS]]<sup>[[User talk:RobSmith|''Deep Six the Deep State!'']]</sup> 11:26, 10 June 2018 (EDT)
::Reuters had a reason to put a copyright watermark on this photograph. You claimed that the photo can be used by the CC 4.0 licence which is definitely wrong. There had been a lot of copyright complaints on several images on many websites, so please do not upload images with a copyright watermark without permission.--[[User:JoeyJ|JoeyJ]] ([[User talk:JoeyJ|talk]]) 15:18, 10 June 2018 (EDT)
:::Let me understand what you are saying: Reuters exerted copyrights over intellectual property produced by the Islamic State. Is that correct? [[User:RobSmith|RobS]]<sup>[[User talk:RobSmith|''Deep Six the Deep State!'']]</sup> 17:05, 12 June 2018 (EDT)
::::Reuters apparently got access to the footage early enough. Could you please tell me why it put a copyright watermark on the photograph?--[[User:JoeyJ|JoeyJ]] ([[User talk:JoeyJ|talk]]) 17:12, 12 June 2018 (EDT)
:::::I dunno, unless Reuters had an embedded cameraman with the Islamic State. I'd like to know under what theory of law (1) Reuters can claim ownership of property produced by the Islamic State, and (2) Why Reuters should be financially compensated for photos of murders thst Reuters didn't produce. (3) Can Reuters show proof they compensated the Islamic State to transfer exclusive ownership to them? [[User:RobSmith|RobS]]<sup>[[User talk:RobSmith|''Deep Six the Deep State!'']]</sup> 17:23, 12 June 2018 (EDT)
::::::Ok, I have asked Andy to restore the image. But please put a applicable licence in the file description. Sorry.--[[User:JoeyJ|JoeyJ]] ([[User talk:JoeyJ|talk]]) 06:10, 13 June 2018 (EDT)
== I moved the National Front article ==
I moved the National Front article. [[User:Conservative|Conservative]] ([[User talk:Conservative|talk]]) 16:05, 12 June 2018 (EDT)
:Thank you very much!--[[User:JoeyJ|JoeyJ]] ([[User talk:JoeyJ|talk]]) 16:57, 12 June 2018 (EDT)
=hi=
if u need a hand with anything feel free to ask. [[User:Massaq25|Massaq25]] ([[User talk:Massaq25|talk]]) 18:04, 29 September 2018 (EDT)
:Alright. Feel welcome here :) Thanks for creating the [[Podesta Group]] article but please try to avoid "stubs" and do not forget to add references to your articles.--[[User:JoeyJ|JoeyJ]] ([[User talk:JoeyJ|talk]]) 18:18, 29 September 2018 (EDT)