64
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 17:
Line 17: + + + + + + +
→Nazism
You're article seems to suggest that the US boycott of Nazi Germany was a bad thing. I assume that you did not mean to imply this. Could someone maybe comment on this? When I do a google search on "boycott Hindenburg helium" I get WashTimes, Chron, and other papers, but the first site to come up is a neo nazi site called adolfthegreat.com. May I add a comment here about the ''reasons'' the US boycotted the evil, atheist Nazi regime?[[User:MoshiachNow|MoshiachNow]] 16:45, 6 May 2007 (EDT)
You're article seems to suggest that the US boycott of Nazi Germany was a bad thing. I assume that you did not mean to imply this. Could someone maybe comment on this? When I do a google search on "boycott Hindenburg helium" I get WashTimes, Chron, and other papers, but the first site to come up is a neo nazi site called adolfthegreat.com. May I add a comment here about the ''reasons'' the US boycotted the evil, atheist Nazi regime?[[User:MoshiachNow|MoshiachNow]] 16:45, 6 May 2007 (EDT)
Why would you undo the factual edit? Do you not think it is relevant to give the real history, as opposed to making it seem that the US ''wanted'' to cause the deaths on the Hindenburg? Are you embarrassed that the US fought the Nazis?[[User:MoshiachNow|MoshiachNow]] 16:53, 6 May 2007 (EDT)
Everybody knows the Nazis were evil. It looks strange and non-encyclopedic to go out of our way to state it. [[User:DanH|DanH]] 16:54, 6 May 2007 (EDT)
Everyone knows who the Almighty is but we talk about Him anyway. The article as it was written clearly implied that the US was somehow responsible, because of an implied bad boycott.[[User:MoshiachNow|MoshiachNow]] 16:56, 6 May 2007 (EDT)