Block, Siteadmin, SkipCaptcha, Upload, Automoderated users, delete, edit, move, nsTeam2RO, nsTeam2RW, nsTeam2_talkRO, nsTeam2_talkRW, protect, rollback, Administrators, template
293,177
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 33:
Line 33: − +
→Incremental radicalism
===Incremental radicalism===
===Incremental radicalism===
While progressive seek radical social change, it is often pursued incrementally. Two examples serve in the Obama era: Obamacare and gay marriage.
While progressives seek radical social change, it is often pursued incrementally. Two examples serve in the Obama era: Obamacare and gay marriage.
Obamacare with its individual and employer dictates was designed to fail. The progressive objective of a [[big government]], [[Soviet]]-style [[single payer]] system was too radical a change to implement during the brief window of opportunity given between 2009-2011, when Democrats controlled both the [[White House]] and a veto-proof Congress. Progressives settled on a system that allowed private insurance companies to continue to operate provided they sold only policies dictated by progressive regulators. A dictate that all American adults - working or not working - be required to purchase insurance, or submit to eligibility requirements for [[entitlement]] care by income means testing, was also implemented. Penalties accrued for anyone non-compliant. The plan was phased in over a period of election cycles with the hope that those who recieved a subsidized entitlement would appreciate "free healthcare," and when the plan failed support a progressive single payer system. The single payer system then would need progressives in Congress perpetually to insure its annual funding.
Obamacare with its individual and employer dictates was designed to fail. The progressive objective of a [[big government]], [[Soviet]]-style [[single payer]] system was too radical a change to implement during the brief window of opportunity given between 2009-2011, when Democrats controlled both the [[White House]] and a veto-proof Congress. Progressives settled on a system that allowed private insurance companies to continue to operate provided they sold only policies dictated by progressive regulators. A dictate that all American adults - working or not working - be required to purchase insurance, or submit to eligibility requirements for [[entitlement]] care by income means testing, was also implemented. Penalties accrued for anyone non-compliant. The plan was phased in over a period of election cycles with the hope that those who recieved a subsidized entitlement would appreciate "free healthcare," and when the plan failed support a progressive single payer system. The single payer system then would need progressives in Congress perpetually to insure its annual funding.