Difference between revisions of "Talk:Prisoner's dilemma"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
| Line 3: | Line 3: | ||
:They're what I learned in Schelling's book "Strategy of Conflict," and in polisci seminars.-'''Speak[http://www.conservapedia.com/User_talk:SpeakerOfTheDead er]''' 14:13, 7 May 2007 (EDT) | :They're what I learned in Schelling's book "Strategy of Conflict," and in polisci seminars.-'''Speak[http://www.conservapedia.com/User_talk:SpeakerOfTheDead er]''' 14:13, 7 May 2007 (EDT) | ||
| + | |||
| + | ::It doesn't make sense to me if A defects and B cooperates A will get 0 and B will get 5. If the U.S. were to nuke USSR and USSR cooperated who would end up winning? Because right now it looks like USSR would win. --[[User:Spyder|Spyder]] 14:20, 7 May 2007 (EDT) | ||
== Censoring? == | == Censoring? == | ||
Are we really censoring "tit for tat" to "t*t for tat"? That seems... a little... overboard?-'''Speak[http://www.conservapedia.com/User_talk:SpeakerOfTheDead er]''' 14:13, 7 May 2007 (EDT) | Are we really censoring "tit for tat" to "t*t for tat"? That seems... a little... overboard?-'''Speak[http://www.conservapedia.com/User_talk:SpeakerOfTheDead er]''' 14:13, 7 May 2007 (EDT) | ||
Revision as of 18:20, May 7, 2007
Relation to International Affairs: Nuclear Detente
How did you determine the values in the table? --Spyder 14:08, 7 May 2007 (EDT)
- They're what I learned in Schelling's book "Strategy of Conflict," and in polisci seminars.-Speaker 14:13, 7 May 2007 (EDT)
- It doesn't make sense to me if A defects and B cooperates A will get 0 and B will get 5. If the U.S. were to nuke USSR and USSR cooperated who would end up winning? Because right now it looks like USSR would win. --Spyder 14:20, 7 May 2007 (EDT)
Censoring?
Are we really censoring "tit for tat" to "t*t for tat"? That seems... a little... overboard?-Speaker 14:13, 7 May 2007 (EDT)