Difference between revisions of "Talk:Strategic Defense Initiative"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
| Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
::Really, SDI was/is about interception of '''ballistic missiles''', and is a strategic, not tactical system, so the article probably shouldn't address tactical systems.[[User:JoyousOne|JoyousOne]] 15:53, 7 May 2007 (EDT) | ::Really, SDI was/is about interception of '''ballistic missiles''', and is a strategic, not tactical system, so the article probably shouldn't address tactical systems.[[User:JoyousOne|JoyousOne]] 15:53, 7 May 2007 (EDT) | ||
:Oh, I see. I look somewhere's else. Thanks! [[User:Flippin|Flippin]] 15:54, 7 May 2007 (EDT) | :Oh, I see. I look somewhere's else. Thanks! [[User:Flippin|Flippin]] 15:54, 7 May 2007 (EDT) | ||
| + | |||
| + | why is a citation needed for the reference to its being called "star wars"? that is such common knowledge.[[User:Bohdan|Bohdan]] | ||
Revision as of 19:57, May 7, 2007
Really interesting article/stub. Is there a way to get something in about the Patriot Missile System? I don't know enough about this. Flippin 15:50, 7 May 2007 (EDT)
- Really, SDI was/is about interception of ballistic missiles, and is a strategic, not tactical system, so the article probably shouldn't address tactical systems.JoyousOne 15:53, 7 May 2007 (EDT)
- Oh, I see. I look somewhere's else. Thanks! Flippin 15:54, 7 May 2007 (EDT)
why is a citation needed for the reference to its being called "star wars"? that is such common knowledge.Bohdan