Difference between revisions of "Talk:Strategic Defense Initiative"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
| Line 4: | Line 4: | ||
why is a citation needed for the reference to its being called "star wars"? that is such common knowledge.[[User:Bohdan|Bohdan]] | why is a citation needed for the reference to its being called "star wars"? that is such common knowledge.[[User:Bohdan|Bohdan]] | ||
| + | |||
| + | ::I have no idea, but it would probably make people happy to have it. It is considered by some to be a derogatory term, so controversy will probably ensue. I certainly do not think it needs to be cited, but perhaps just explained. IMO[[User:JoyousOne|JoyousOne]] 15:59, 7 May 2007 (EDT) | ||
Latest revision as of 19:59, May 7, 2007
Really interesting article/stub. Is there a way to get something in about the Patriot Missile System? I don't know enough about this. Flippin 15:50, 7 May 2007 (EDT)
- Really, SDI was/is about interception of ballistic missiles, and is a strategic, not tactical system, so the article probably shouldn't address tactical systems.JoyousOne 15:53, 7 May 2007 (EDT)
- Oh, I see. I look somewhere's else. Thanks! Flippin 15:54, 7 May 2007 (EDT)
why is a citation needed for the reference to its being called "star wars"? that is such common knowledge.Bohdan
- I have no idea, but it would probably make people happy to have it. It is considered by some to be a derogatory term, so controversy will probably ensue. I certainly do not think it needs to be cited, but perhaps just explained. IMOJoyousOne 15:59, 7 May 2007 (EDT)