Difference between revisions of "Conservapedia talk:Blocking policy"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
| − | |||
''This is a COPY'' of Terry's comment, in response to the post "Please don't block me!" | ''This is a COPY'' of Terry's comment, in response to the post "Please don't block me!" | ||
| Line 7: | Line 6: | ||
:Also, repeated reverts, after a warning either on the Talk page of the article, or the users Talk page, should suffice for blocking grounds. --~ [[User:TK|TerryK]] <sup>[[User_talk:TK|MyTalk]]</sup> 23:59, 2 April 2007 (EDT) | :Also, repeated reverts, after a warning either on the Talk page of the article, or the users Talk page, should suffice for blocking grounds. --~ [[User:TK|TerryK]] <sup>[[User_talk:TK|MyTalk]]</sup> 23:59, 2 April 2007 (EDT) | ||
| − | ::''If you are wrong, or there is the strong possibility you are, your actions can always be reversed.'' If you can make your case heard, haing been blocked, and against entrenched and dogmatic oppositiuon. There are too many pharisees on this site. | + | ::''If you are wrong, or there is the strong possibility you are, your actions can always be reversed.'' If you can make your case heard, haing been blocked, and against entrenched and dogmatic oppositiuon. There are too many pharisees on this site. [[User:Unthank|Unthank]] 18:49, 7 May 2007 (EDT) |
Revision as of 22:49, May 7, 2007
This is a COPY of Terry's comment, in response to the post "Please don't block me!"
Don't beat yourself up, Ed. You're a good guy. There is a reason Andy (among others) advises to block early. Once you have been an Admin on a site or two, you spot them, and go with your gut, not your heart or mind. ;-) Easier to add someone back, than to block too late, imo. --~ TerryK MyTalk 09:55, 29 March 2007 (EDT)
- One might add that there isn't some codified "right" to belong anywhere on the Internet. Users removed for real or preceived violations are not abused in any manner. Fairness is what matters. If you are wrong, or there is the strong possibility you are, your actions can always be reversed. --~ TerryK MyTalk 20:22, 2 April 2007 (EDT)
- Also, repeated reverts, after a warning either on the Talk page of the article, or the users Talk page, should suffice for blocking grounds. --~ TerryK MyTalk 23:59, 2 April 2007 (EDT)
- If you are wrong, or there is the strong possibility you are, your actions can always be reversed. If you can make your case heard, haing been blocked, and against entrenched and dogmatic oppositiuon. There are too many pharisees on this site. Unthank 18:49, 7 May 2007 (EDT)