Changes

the attitude which underlies the sexual revolution needs more exposition + the consequences
Line 14: Line 14:     
<references/>
 
<references/>
 +
 +
==Direction of the article==
 +
 +
We don't need to justify Kinsey - that's a separate issue in itself. And the role of condoms and the Pill was overblown: these merely greased the gears that were already turning.
 +
 +
It's the attitude which underlies the sexual revolution which needs more exposition. Also, we need to detail the consequences.
 +
*the deep unhappiness experienced by girls (and often boys) who give up their virginity to sexual experimentation - instead of "saving it for marriage"
 +
*the divorce culture, and the terrible toll it takes on children (see [[Children of divorce]])
 +
*the prison of self-centered promiscuous [[homosexual activity]] (it's not because of societal disapproval, because the murder-suicide-addiction rate is sky high even in "gay" enclaves such as San Francisco, Greenwich Village, and Provincetown, Massachusetts).
 +
 +
The [[homosexual agenda]] to destroy marriage cuts to the heart of this, and its unholy alliance with radical [[Feminism]] should also be explored. --[[User:Ed Poor|Ed Poor]] 16:05, 8 May 2007 (EDT)
Siteadmin, Check users, nsTeam1RO, nsTeam1RW, nsTeam1_talkRO, nsTeam1_talkRW, oversight, Administrators
30,650

edits