Difference between revisions of "Creation scientist"

From Conservapedia
Jump to navigation Jump to search
({{merge|creation science}})
(Remove nonsense. The Bible says that God created birds, not eggs.)
Line 1: Line 1:
 
{{merge|creation science}}
 
{{merge|creation science}}
 
A creation scientist is one who attempts to use traditional tools of science to show that the scientific evidence is consistent with the biblical record.  
 
A creation scientist is one who attempts to use traditional tools of science to show that the scientific evidence is consistent with the biblical record.  
−
 
−
[[Creation scientists]] haven't yet figured what came first: the [[chicken]] or the egg. This is known as the [[creation conundrum]]. [[Evolutionists]] maintain that the egg must have come first, since, a true chicken can only hatch from a true chicken egg, but two parent birds which were not quite 'genetically' chickens can in theory have fertilised and laid it, and given rise to the first true chicken. How one defines what is genetically a true chicken and what is not quite a chicken is, of course, open for debate. 
 
  
 
United States courts have held that creation science, as practiced by creation scientists, is a form of religion.  ''See, e.g., Kitzmiller v. Dover Area School District,'' 400 F. Supp.2d 724.
 
United States courts have held that creation science, as practiced by creation scientists, is a form of religion.  ''See, e.g., Kitzmiller v. Dover Area School District,'' 400 F. Supp.2d 724.

Revision as of 02:53, May 9, 2007

It has been suggested that this article or section be merged with [[::creation science|creation science]]. (Discuss)

A creation scientist is one who attempts to use traditional tools of science to show that the scientific evidence is consistent with the biblical record.

United States courts have held that creation science, as practiced by creation scientists, is a form of religion. See, e.g., Kitzmiller v. Dover Area School District, 400 F. Supp.2d 724.