Difference between revisions of "Government regulation of greenhouse-gas emissions"

From Conservapedia
Jump to: navigation, search
(Created page with ""... prominent scientists and climatologists called government regulation of greenhouse-gas emissions “irresponsible and immoral” because of the lack of credible evidence tha...")
 
(top: HTTP --> HTTPS, replaced: http://www.heritage.org/ → https://www.heritage.org/)
 
(3 intermediate revisions by 3 users not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
"... prominent scientists and climatologists called government regulation of greenhouse-gas emissions “irresponsible and immoral” because of the lack of credible evidence that such emissions threaten to human health or public welfare." [http://www.heritage.org/research/reports/2011/11/new-epa-inspector-general-report-one-more-reason-to-reject-climate-change-regulation#_edn16]
+
"... prominent [[scientists]] and [[climatology|climatologists]] called [[government]] regulation of [[greenhouse gas]] emissions “irresponsible and immoral” because of the lack of credible evidence that such emissions threaten to human health or public welfare." [https://www.heritage.org/research/reports/2011/11/new-epa-inspector-general-report-one-more-reason-to-reject-climate-change-regulation#_edn16]
 +
[[Category:Environmentalism]]

Latest revision as of 12:19, April 2, 2019

"... prominent scientists and climatologists called government regulation of greenhouse gas emissions “irresponsible and immoral” because of the lack of credible evidence that such emissions threaten to human health or public welfare." [1]