Changes

The '''Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change''' ('''IPCC''') was created by the United Nations to publish scientific evidence for the theory of human-caused global warming, which would then give governments a scientific justification for signing the global warming treaty (see [[Kyoto Protocol]]). However, "its most recent report which was found to contain factual errors and claims which were not based on rigorous scientific research." [http://www.telegraph.co.uk/earth/environment/climatechange/7437016/UN-climate-change-claims-on-rainforests-were-wrong-study-suggests.html]

The '''Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change''' ('''IPCC''') was created by the United Nations to publish scientific evidence for the theory of human-caused global warming, which would then give governments a scientific justification for signing the global warming treaty (see [[Kyoto Protocol]]). However, "its most recent report which was found to contain factual errors and claims which were not based on rigorous scientific research." [https://www.telegraph.co.uk/earth/environment/climatechange/7437016/UN-climate-change-claims-on-rainforests-were-wrong-study-suggests.html]

Although it is generally considered to be an objective, neutral scientific body trying to find out whether or not the [[global warming theory]] is true, in actuality it had a biased agenda from the start.

Although it is generally considered to be an objective, neutral scientific body trying to find out whether or not the [[global warming theory]] is true, in actuality it had a biased agenda from the start.

On at least two occasions, the IPCC has issued summaries for policymakers which contradict the scientific reports submitted to it. In the most recent case, they issued their summary '''before''' receiving the report.<ref>The misuse of the IPCC summaries, however, is not entirely accidental.</ref><ref>...it was discovered that substantial, possibly unauthorized changes were made in the IPCC report that forms the scientific basis for decisions regarding the UN Climate Convention. The revisions were made quietly after the acceptance of the report and before its printing. As confirmed in the scientific journal Nature (June 13), the changes altered the sense of the (scientific) report and were done in order to "conform" it to the IPCC's (political) Summary for Policymakers. [http://www.sepp.org/Archive/controv/ipcccont/wirth.htm]</ref>

On at least two occasions, the IPCC has issued summaries for policymakers which contradict the scientific reports submitted to it. In the most recent case, they issued their summary '''before''' receiving the report.<ref>The misuse of the IPCC summaries, however, is not entirely accidental.</ref><ref>...it was discovered that substantial, possibly unauthorized changes were made in the IPCC report that forms the scientific basis for decisions regarding the UN Climate Convention. The revisions were made quietly after the acceptance of the report and before its printing. As confirmed in the scientific journal Nature (June 13), the changes altered the sense of the (scientific) report and were done in order to "conform" it to the IPCC's (political) Summary for Policymakers. [http://www.sepp.org/Archive/controv/ipcccont/wirth.htm]</ref>

Entrenched as a major role player of [[Climategate#Climategate Fraud|Climategate Fraud]], the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change admitted its 2007 benchmark report was false, and that it isn't true what the IPCC originally claimed, "[E]ven a slight change in rainfall could see swathes of the rain forest rapidly replaced by savanna grassland." [[ClimateGate]] forced the United Nations climate watchdog to admit intentionally publishing false claims; the IPCC claims about melting ice in the [[Alps]], the [[Andes]], and in [[Africa]] did not come from [[peer review]]ed scientific literature—but from ''Climbing Magazine'', and from a student dissertation—written by a [[climate change]] [[activist]] who was studying for a degree in [[Geography]].<ref>[[Glenn Beck]]. [http://www.glennbeck.com/content/articles/article/198/35784/ Exclusive: Yet another climategate?], ''The Glenn Beck Program'', February 1, 2010.</ref> The IPCC claims that global warming might wipe out 40% of the [[Amazon River|Amazon]] [[Forest|rainforest]] was based on an unsubstantiated claim by green campaigners who had little scientific expertise.<ref>Jonathan Leake. [http://www.timesonline.co.uk/tol/news/environment/article7009705.ece UN climate panel shamed by bogus rainforest claim], ''[[The Sunday Times]]'', January 31, 2010.</ref><ref>Richard Gray. [http://www.telegraph.co.uk/earth/environment/climatechange/7111525/UN-climate-change-panel-based-claims-on-student-dissertation-and-magazine-article.html UN climate change panel based claims on student dissertation and magazine article], Telegraph.co.uk, January 30, 2010.</ref>  

Entrenched as a major role player of [[Climategate#Climategate Fraud|Climategate Fraud]], the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change admitted its 2007 benchmark report was false, and that it isn't true what the IPCC originally claimed, "[E]ven a slight change in rainfall could see swathes of the rain forest rapidly replaced by savanna grassland." [[ClimateGate]] forced the United Nations climate watchdog to admit intentionally publishing false claims; the IPCC claims about melting ice in the [[Alps]], the [[Andes]], and in [[Africa]] did not come from [[peer review]]ed scientific literature—but from ''Climbing Magazine'', and from a student dissertation—written by a [[climate change]] [[activist]] who was studying for a degree in [[Geography]].<ref>[[Glenn Beck]]. [http://www.glennbeck.com/content/articles/article/198/35784/ Exclusive: Yet another climategate?], ''The Glenn Beck Program'', February 1, 2010.</ref> The IPCC claims that global warming might wipe out 40% of the [[Amazon River|Amazon]] [[Forest|rainforest]] was based on an unsubstantiated claim by green campaigners who had little scientific expertise.<ref>Jonathan Leake. [http://www.timesonline.co.uk/tol/news/environment/article7009705.ece UN climate panel shamed by bogus rainforest claim], ''[[The Sunday Times]]'', January 31, 2010.</ref><ref>Richard Gray. [https://www.telegraph.co.uk/earth/environment/climatechange/7111525/UN-climate-change-panel-based-claims-on-student-dissertation-and-magazine-article.html UN climate change panel based claims on student dissertation and magazine article], Telegraph.co.uk, January 30, 2010.</ref>  

==Notes==

==Notes==