Difference between revisions of "Sysop talk:Talk/Archive 1"
m (Protected "Conservapedia talk:Sysops" [edit=sysop:move=sysop]) |
m (Protected "Conservapedia talk:Sysops" [edit=autoconfirmed:move=autoconfirmed]) |
(No difference)
| |
Revision as of 04:42, May 9, 2007
Aschlafly spake thusly:I don't think this is the first time anyone has thought of this. I would expect Google's search engines to recognize this scam and filter it fairly soon. But if not, the perpetrators are using our name without our permission and I think that violates our intellectual property. We'll have them explain themselves to a judge if they want to persist in this. Also, we can tell their ISP and it will stop intellectual property violations that use its machines. -- 19:27, 15 April 2007 (EDT)
- Given that the copyright is as it is, the offensive redirect may not violate anything? They are not using the name Conservapedia at all, no?-- Rob Pommertalk 00:59, 16 April 2007 (EDT)
- Oh, I thought they were, but maybe I'm mistaken.--Aschlafly 01:11, 16 April 2007 (EDT)
The site is under attack as of 0045
Throw away accounts
I have heard some users suspect, as do I, that there are throw away accounts being used by WP users coming here to retaliate. Is there a template or a desire to list this accounts, e.g., {{suspected throw away account|This account will be removed if not used within 28 days. If this warning is in error, the user of this account may delete it|Today's Date}} Or are such throw away accounts not bothersome or otherwise useful? I have identified at least two such suspect hit and run accounts, but have not tagged them or anything. HeartOfGold 00:11, 9 May 2007 (EDT)
- Good idea. RobS 00:24, 9 May 2007 (EDT)