Difference between revisions of "Betteridge's law of headlines"

From Conservapedia
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(→‎Possible examples: HTTP --> HTTPS, replaced: http://www.redstate.com → https://www.redstate.com, http://www.theblaze.com → https://www.theblaze.com, http://www.dailymail.co.uk → https://www.dailymail.co.uk, http://www.thedailybeast.com → ht...)
(→‎Possible examples: HTTP --> HTTPS #3, replaced: http://abcnews.go.com → https://abcnews.go.com, http://www.bbc.com → https://www.bbc.com)
 
Line 17: Line 17:
 
*[http://toprightnews.com/?p=2422 "Is Sen. Harry Reid Behind the BLM Land Grab of the Bundy Ranch?"]
 
*[http://toprightnews.com/?p=2422 "Is Sen. Harry Reid Behind the BLM Land Grab of the Bundy Ranch?"]
 
*[http://www.parkridgeattorney.com/2014/02/25/lots-lawyer-jokes-arbitrator-jokes/ "Mandatory Arbitration: Friend of Big Business and Enemy of Consumers?"]
 
*[http://www.parkridgeattorney.com/2014/02/25/lots-lawyer-jokes-arbitrator-jokes/ "Mandatory Arbitration: Friend of Big Business and Enemy of Consumers?"]
−
*[http://abcnews.go.com/Business/companies-voiding-sue-facebook/t/story?id=23363842 "Do Companies Void Your Right to Sue If You 'Like' Them on Facebook?"]
+
*[https://abcnews.go.com/Business/companies-voiding-sue-facebook/t/story?id=23363842 "Do Companies Void Your Right to Sue If You 'Like' Them on Facebook?"]
 
*[http://consumerist.com/2007/07/23/are-aribitrators-punished-by-credit-card-companies-for-ruling-in-favor-of-the-consumer/ "Are Aribitrators <nowiki>[</nowiki>''sic''<nowiki>]</nowiki> Punished By Credit Card Companies For Ruling In Favor Of The Consumer?"]
 
*[http://consumerist.com/2007/07/23/are-aribitrators-punished-by-credit-card-companies-for-ruling-in-favor-of-the-consumer/ "Are Aribitrators <nowiki>[</nowiki>''sic''<nowiki>]</nowiki> Punished By Credit Card Companies For Ruling In Favor Of The Consumer?"]
 
*"Did Obama set up an 'Constitution-exemption zone' within 100 miles of the U.S./Mexican border?"
 
*"Did Obama set up an 'Constitution-exemption zone' within 100 miles of the U.S./Mexican border?"
Line 34: Line 34:
 
*[https://www.dailymail.co.uk/sciencetech/article-3160894/Could-roads-PLASTIC-spell-end-potholes-Recycled-bottles-finally-end-scourge-motorist.html?ito=social-facebook "Could roads made from PLASTIC spell the end of potholes?"]
 
*[https://www.dailymail.co.uk/sciencetech/article-3160894/Could-roads-PLASTIC-spell-end-potholes-Recycled-bottles-finally-end-scourge-motorist.html?ito=social-facebook "Could roads made from PLASTIC spell the end of potholes?"]
 
*[http://fortune.com/2015/09/24/draftkings-fanduel-legal/ "Are DraftKings and FanDuel legal?"]
 
*[http://fortune.com/2015/09/24/draftkings-fanduel-legal/ "Are DraftKings and FanDuel legal?"]
−
*[http://www.bbc.com/news/world-us-canada-35066940 "Is Donald Trump a Democratic secret agent?"]
+
*[https://www.bbc.com/news/world-us-canada-35066940 "Is Donald Trump a Democratic secret agent?"]
 
*[http://consumerist.com/2014/01/23/is-target-shaving-workers-hours-so-it-doesnt-have-to-insure-them/ "Is Target Shaving Workers’ Hours So It Doesn’t Have To Insure Them?"]
 
*[http://consumerist.com/2014/01/23/is-target-shaving-workers-hours-so-it-doesnt-have-to-insure-them/ "Is Target Shaving Workers’ Hours So It Doesn’t Have To Insure Them?"]
 
*[https://www.thedailybeast.com/articles/2016/02/09/is-there-a-libertarian-case-for-bernie-sanders.html "Is There a Libertarian Case for Bernie Sanders?"]
 
*[https://www.thedailybeast.com/articles/2016/02/09/is-there-a-libertarian-case-for-bernie-sanders.html "Is There a Libertarian Case for Bernie Sanders?"]

Latest revision as of 05:37, April 9, 2019

Betteridge's law of headlines states that headlines that end with a question mark can be safely answered "no".[1]

Possible examples

References