Difference between revisions of "Essay:Evolution and intelligent design"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
DavidB4-bot (talk | contribs) m (Default Sort) |
DavidB4-bot (talk | contribs) m (→top: HTTP --> HTTPS #3, replaced: http://www.pbs.org → https://www.pbs.org) |
||
| Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
[[Phillip E. Johnson]] told [[NOVA (PBS)|NOVA]]: | [[Phillip E. Johnson]] told [[NOVA (PBS)|NOVA]]: | ||
| − | {{quotebox|The [[theory of evolution]] may be true in a sense, but it may require the participation of an [[intelligent cause]]. That is the basic intelligent-design proposition—that unintelligent causes by themselves can't do the whole job. That doesn't say that everything was created all at once. [ | + | {{quotebox|The [[theory of evolution]] may be true in a sense, but it may require the participation of an [[intelligent cause]]. That is the basic intelligent-design proposition—that unintelligent causes by themselves can't do the whole job. That doesn't say that everything was created all at once. [https://www.pbs.org/wgbh/nova/id/defense-id.html]}} |
==See also== | ==See also== | ||
Latest revision as of 11:51, April 9, 2019
The theory of evolution is merely a religion that serves to discredit the Intelligent Designer Himself. [1]
Phillip E. Johnson told NOVA:
The theory of evolution may be true in a sense, but it may require the participation of an intelligent cause. That is the basic intelligent-design proposition—that unintelligent causes by themselves can't do the whole job. That doesn't say that everything was created all at once. [2]