| Line 15: |
Line 15: |
| | | | |
| | The [[Institute for Creation Research]] (ICR) wrote the following regarding Neanderthal man: | | The [[Institute for Creation Research]] (ICR) wrote the following regarding Neanderthal man: |
| − | {{cquote|No other organisms, either living or fossil, made tools to make other complex tools, buried their dead, had controlled use of fire, practiced religious ceremonies, used complex syntax in their spoken grammar, and played musical instruments, yet we know from their fossils that Neanderthal engaged in all.<ref>http://www.icr.org/article/468/</ref>}} | + | {{cquote|No other organisms, either living or fossil, made tools to make other complex tools, buried their dead, had controlled use of fire, practiced religious ceremonies, used complex syntax in their spoken grammar, and played musical instruments, yet we know from their fossils that Neanderthal engaged in all.<ref>https://www.icr.org/article/468/</ref>}} |
| | | | |
| | Neanderthals were probably about as intelligent as an average modern human, they were social creatures living in small tribes, like the other human species of their time. Studies suggest that Neanderthal tribes interacted less with each other than other tribes did. {{fact}} | | Neanderthals were probably about as intelligent as an average modern human, they were social creatures living in small tribes, like the other human species of their time. Studies suggest that Neanderthal tribes interacted less with each other than other tribes did. {{fact}} |
| Line 35: |
Line 35: |
| | | | |
| | The Institute for Creation Research explains about the DNA evidence: | | The Institute for Creation Research explains about the DNA evidence: |
| − | {{cquote|The recent recovery of mitochondrial DNA from the right humerus of the Neanderthal remains from Neander Valley near Düsseldorf, Germany, has been of great interest to evolutionists and creationists alike (Krings et al., 1997). Based on the comparison of modern human mt DNA and that taken from the Neanderthal, evolutionists have argued that the "Neanderthal line" diverged from the line of "hominids" leading to modern humans about 600,000 years B.P. without contributing mt DNA to modern Homo sapiens populations. This strongly implies that Neanderthals were a different species from modern humans. However, the above noted interpretation is not scientifically justified. Lubenow (1998) has pointed out that the use of a statistical average of a large modern human sample (994 sequences from 1669 modern humans) compared with the mt DNA sequence from one Neanderthal is not appropriate. Furthermore, the mt DNA sequence differences among modern humans range from 1 to 24 substitutions, with an average of eight substitutions, whereas, the mt DNA sequence differences between modern man and the Neanderthal specimen range from 22 to 36 substitutions, placing Neanderthals, at worst, on the fringes of the modern range.<ref>http://www.icr.org/article/468/</ref>}} | + | {{cquote|The recent recovery of mitochondrial DNA from the right humerus of the Neanderthal remains from Neander Valley near Düsseldorf, Germany, has been of great interest to evolutionists and creationists alike (Krings et al., 1997). Based on the comparison of modern human mt DNA and that taken from the Neanderthal, evolutionists have argued that the "Neanderthal line" diverged from the line of "hominids" leading to modern humans about 600,000 years B.P. without contributing mt DNA to modern Homo sapiens populations. This strongly implies that Neanderthals were a different species from modern humans. However, the above noted interpretation is not scientifically justified. Lubenow (1998) has pointed out that the use of a statistical average of a large modern human sample (994 sequences from 1669 modern humans) compared with the mt DNA sequence from one Neanderthal is not appropriate. Furthermore, the mt DNA sequence differences among modern humans range from 1 to 24 substitutions, with an average of eight substitutions, whereas, the mt DNA sequence differences between modern man and the Neanderthal specimen range from 22 to 36 substitutions, placing Neanderthals, at worst, on the fringes of the modern range.<ref>https://www.icr.org/article/468/</ref>}} |
| | | | |
| − | Harsh conditions due to the [[Ice Age]] after the [[flood|Great flood]] caused human groups to migrate and splinter off to survive. Neanderthal type traits were best suited for the harsh cold. Malnutrition and longer life spans could cause features similar to those seen in Neanderthal skeletons.<ref>[http://www.icr.org/article/468/ Neanderthals are still human]</ref> | + | Harsh conditions due to the [[Ice Age]] after the [[flood|Great flood]] caused human groups to migrate and splinter off to survive. Neanderthal type traits were best suited for the harsh cold. Malnutrition and longer life spans could cause features similar to those seen in Neanderthal skeletons.<ref>[https://www.icr.org/article/468/ Neanderthals are still human]</ref> |
| | | | |
| | == History according to Evolutionists == | | == History according to Evolutionists == |