Difference between revisions of "Talk:Cross-dressing"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
(Trying to be positive here) |
|||
| Line 5: | Line 5: | ||
But this is terrible. This article has zero-depth. And, frankly, do we need the paragraph at the bottom? I mean, honestly, why not just describe the act and the attraction to said act and move on? Why all this religious stuff about the wearing of clothes? [[User:Flippin|Flippin]] 16:35, 9 May 2007 (EDT) | But this is terrible. This article has zero-depth. And, frankly, do we need the paragraph at the bottom? I mean, honestly, why not just describe the act and the attraction to said act and move on? Why all this religious stuff about the wearing of clothes? [[User:Flippin|Flippin]] 16:35, 9 May 2007 (EDT) | ||
| + | :Well, it is in the [[Bible]]. I'm honestly appalled at the practice, but it seems to be gaining more prevalence as time goes on. <font color="FF8700">[[User:Vossy|Vossy]]</font><sup><font color="CC0000">[[User_talk:Vossy|speak]]</font></sup> 16:38, 9 May 2007 (EDT) | ||
Revision as of 20:38, May 9, 2007
You could spin off a Temptation article from this. --Ed Poor 16:32, 9 May 2007 (EDT)
- Indeed. I was surprised that the link was red. I was sure we'd have something on temptation by now. Vossyspeak 16:34, 9 May 2007 (EDT)
Trying to be positive here
But this is terrible. This article has zero-depth. And, frankly, do we need the paragraph at the bottom? I mean, honestly, why not just describe the act and the attraction to said act and move on? Why all this religious stuff about the wearing of clothes? Flippin 16:35, 9 May 2007 (EDT)