Changes

Hmmm...Do you think it should stay? I could see the cartoon itself as a way of introducing small children to Franklin, but I don't think most encyclopedias, even those for children, would include such a piece.--[[User:1048247|1048247]] 16:26, 9 May 2007 (EDT)

Hmmm...Do you think it should stay? I could see the cartoon itself as a way of introducing small children to Franklin, but I don't think most encyclopedias, even those for children, would include such a piece.--[[User:1048247|1048247]] 16:26, 9 May 2007 (EDT)

:Let's see what others think. The cartoon is awful, by the way, but the book is great. The book is ''not'' for small children; in fact it's one of those books that appeals to adults just as much as kids. It sounds as if you haven't read it... I certainly wouldn't object to making it a separate article with a "See also" link (mentioning that it is fictional). [[User:Dpbsmith|Dpbsmith]] 18:46, 9 May 2007 (EDT)

:Let's see what others think. I'm not disinterested: I added it. It did it mostly because of a complaint that the article seemed to be mostly about Franklin's religious views, and it seemed to me to be a) relevant content, that b) certainly had nothing to do with his religious views.

 

:The cartoon is awful, by the way, but the book is great. The book is ''not'' for small children; in fact it's one of those books that appeals to adults just as much as kids. It sounds as if you haven't read it... I certainly wouldn't object to making it a separate article with a "See also" link (mentioning that it is fictional). [[User:Dpbsmith|Dpbsmith]] 18:46, 9 May 2007 (EDT)