Changes

104 bytes added ,  05:04, May 10, 2007
Line 451: Line 451:  
:::::Is it your opinion that the Nazi claims about a planned Bolshevik bloodbath in the wake of the Reichstag were true? Why, then was none of the promised evidence for this conspiracy offered? --[[User:PF Fox|PF Fox]] 15:10, 2 May 2007 (EDT)
 
:::::Is it your opinion that the Nazi claims about a planned Bolshevik bloodbath in the wake of the Reichstag were true? Why, then was none of the promised evidence for this conspiracy offered? --[[User:PF Fox|PF Fox]] 15:10, 2 May 2007 (EDT)
   −
It is beyond doubt that they were communists, but if how favr the comintern was involved is still disputed. It doesn't hurt to call them ''communists'' instead of 'comintern activists''. The latter is more confusing, and it needlessly picks a side in discussion on a disputed event. [[User:Order]] May 10
+
It is beyond doubt that they were ''communists'', but if how far the comintern was involved in any of this is still disputed. And it is not that relevant. It doesn't hurt to call them ''communists'' instead of 'comintern activists''. The latter is more confusing to the one who doesn't know the cognates of comintern, and it needlessly picks a side in an discussion on a disputed event. [[User:Order]] May 10
    
==Wiesel Quote==
 
==Wiesel Quote==
2,002

edits