Difference between revisions of "Talk:Theory of relativity"

From Conservapedia
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(Great article)
(No difference)

Revision as of 14:12, February 22, 2007

Great article

1) Superb avoidance of difficult science in a scientific article. Best not to be confusing. 2) Nice attention on Eddington rather than the theory itself. 3) Good mind reading regarding Eddington's dreams. 4) Nice work ignoring the facts about things that have been inventing using GR such as GPS

And rather than simply be sarcastic, I will work on a better article over the weekend. One that actually discusses the science.