Changes

Jump to navigation Jump to search
34 bytes added ,  03:31, July 13, 2019
→‎Trans-substance: the Catholic doctrine of "transubstantiation": revised "understanding" to "complete understanding" - revised "no evidence of human cellular tissue" to "no evidence of human cellular tissue in the consecrated bread and wine"
Line 7: Line 7:  
The philosophical idea of substance is what Catholic [[eucharist]]ic doctrine means in saying that the substance of the bread and wine are "[[Transubstantiation|transubstantiated]]" into the substance of the body and blood of Christ including his soul and divinity, but that the outward appearances remain. The substance is changed, the matter is not. The substance of them is no longer that of food but the substance of a Person. As food in the human body is transformed in a few hours into flesh and blood and bone, so Christ in the consecration by the priest instantly unites the "elements" of the bread and wine offered on the altar to himself as being one with his whole Person, body, blood, soul, and divinity. By [[analogy]], just as the chemical elements of food, the carbon, calcium, protein, salt, iron, copper, sugars, fats, water and trace elements, and their molecular and atomic structures, all remain what they are even after [[metabolism]] by the body, and are no longer food but flesh and blood and bone, so the food of bread and wine offered in sacrifice to Christ on the altar have been made by Christ Jesus into the [[real presence]] of Christ himself and are one with him without any apparent change in their outward appearance.  
 
The philosophical idea of substance is what Catholic [[eucharist]]ic doctrine means in saying that the substance of the bread and wine are "[[Transubstantiation|transubstantiated]]" into the substance of the body and blood of Christ including his soul and divinity, but that the outward appearances remain. The substance is changed, the matter is not. The substance of them is no longer that of food but the substance of a Person. As food in the human body is transformed in a few hours into flesh and blood and bone, so Christ in the consecration by the priest instantly unites the "elements" of the bread and wine offered on the altar to himself as being one with his whole Person, body, blood, soul, and divinity. By [[analogy]], just as the chemical elements of food, the carbon, calcium, protein, salt, iron, copper, sugars, fats, water and trace elements, and their molecular and atomic structures, all remain what they are even after [[metabolism]] by the body, and are no longer food but flesh and blood and bone, so the food of bread and wine offered in sacrifice to Christ on the altar have been made by Christ Jesus into the [[real presence]] of Christ himself and are one with him without any apparent change in their outward appearance.  
   −
Critics who utterly reject this doctrine as an impossible absurdity say that it utterly strains all credibility by totally violating the God-given [[intelligence]] of human [[reason]] and ordinary [[common sense]]. They say that there is no evidence of any change in the substances of the bread and wine after the consecration, that bread obviously remains bread and wine obviously remains wine, and that neither one of them looks, feels and tastes like human flesh and blood, not to mention soul, and spirit and the divine nature of divinity; but when food is transformed into flesh and blood and bone the change is most definitely obvious. They point out that even under the microscope there is no evidence of human cellular tissue. Even at the subatomic level, the elements of bread and wine do not change. By no reasonable stretch of the imagination do they regard the bread and wine of the eucharist as God. They conclude that Jesus was speaking only symbolically when he said, "This is my body. This is my blood." For this reason the doctrine of transubstantiation is regarded as impossible, an unintelligent, [[Ignorance|ignorant]], [[mind]]less, [[Paganism|pagan]] [[superstition]].
+
Critics who utterly reject this doctrine as an impossible absurdity say that it utterly strains all credibility by totally violating the God-given [[intelligence]] of human [[reason]] and ordinary [[common sense]]. They say that there is no evidence of any change in the substances of the bread and wine after the consecration, that bread obviously remains bread and wine obviously remains wine, and that neither one of them looks, feels and tastes like human flesh and blood, not to mention soul, and spirit and the divine nature of divinity; but when food is transformed into flesh and blood and bone the change is most definitely obvious. They point out that even under the microscope there is no evidence of human cellular tissue in the consecrated bread and wine. Even at the subatomic level, the elements of bread and wine do not change. By no reasonable stretch of the imagination do they regard the bread and wine of the eucharist as God. They conclude that Jesus was speaking only symbolically when he said, "This is my body. This is my blood." For this reason the doctrine of transubstantiation is regarded as impossible, an unintelligent, [[Ignorance|ignorant]], [[mind]]less, [[Paganism|pagan]] [[superstition]].
    
[[Christian apologetics|Catholic apologists]] respond that as the atoms of matter are not visible under the microscope and can be transformed in the atomic laboratory from one element to another, so by analogy the change in the substance of the bread and wine is not visible. As the body is visible, the invisible soul of the living body is not. And while the forms of bread and wine and their chemical structures are visible, the invisible Christ present in those forms, whole and entire, is not. He himself is present, in Person, as God. And as in Christ Jesus the "fulness of divinity dwells bodily"<ref>Colossians 2:9</ref>, the Father in him and he in the Father<ref>John 14:8-11</ref>, so likewise in the Eucharistic elements received as food in communion the fulness of Jesus himself, body, blood, soul and divinity is present<ref>John 6:41-69</ref>; and those who partake of communion with him partake of the divine nature<ref>2 Peter 1:3-4</ref>.
 
[[Christian apologetics|Catholic apologists]] respond that as the atoms of matter are not visible under the microscope and can be transformed in the atomic laboratory from one element to another, so by analogy the change in the substance of the bread and wine is not visible. As the body is visible, the invisible soul of the living body is not. And while the forms of bread and wine and their chemical structures are visible, the invisible Christ present in those forms, whole and entire, is not. He himself is present, in Person, as God. And as in Christ Jesus the "fulness of divinity dwells bodily"<ref>Colossians 2:9</ref>, the Father in him and he in the Father<ref>John 14:8-11</ref>, so likewise in the Eucharistic elements received as food in communion the fulness of Jesus himself, body, blood, soul and divinity is present<ref>John 6:41-69</ref>; and those who partake of communion with him partake of the divine nature<ref>2 Peter 1:3-4</ref>.
Block, SkipCaptcha, Upload, Automoderated users, edit, move, protect
30,891

edits

Navigation menu