Irenaeus, Siteadmin, Check users, oversight, Administrators
351,411
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 27:
Line 27: + + + + +
→Weakness of counter-apologetics
On the other hand, atheism and agnosticism lack proof/evidence and are unreasonable (see: [[Attempts to dilute the definition of atheism#Purpose of attempting to dilute the definition of atheism|Atheism lacks proof and evidence]] and [[Rebuttals to atheist arguments]] and [[Agnosticism quotes#Norman Geisler on complete agnosticism|Agnosticism lacks proof/evidence and it is unreasonable]]).
On the other hand, atheism and agnosticism lack proof/evidence and are unreasonable (see: [[Attempts to dilute the definition of atheism#Purpose of attempting to dilute the definition of atheism|Atheism lacks proof and evidence]] and [[Rebuttals to atheist arguments]] and [[Agnosticism quotes#Norman Geisler on complete agnosticism|Agnosticism lacks proof/evidence and it is unreasonable]]).
== Anthony Flew on the weakness of Richard Dawkins's arguments ==
''See also:'' [[Feminist quotes about Richard Dawkins]] and [[Richard Dawkins quotes]]
Antony Flew said about the [[New Atheism|new atheist]] [[Richard Dawkins]]: “The fault of Dawkins as an academic…was his scandalous and apparently deliberate refusal to present the doctrine he appears to think he has refuted in its strongest form”.<ref>[http://www.newsletter.co.uk/news/opinion/ten-years-on-from-that-book-of-atheistic-faith-the-god-delusion-1-7496360 Ten years on from that book of atheistic faith, the God Delusion] by Mike Taggart</ref>
== Shockofgod vs. the counter-apologist Matt Dillahunty ==
== Shockofgod vs. the counter-apologist Matt Dillahunty ==