Difference between revisions of "Talk:Theocracy"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
(New page: Why do certain editors have a problem with the word Biblical law? ~~~~) |
|||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
Why do certain editors have a problem with the word Biblical law? | Why do certain editors have a problem with the word Biblical law? | ||
| − | [[User:MiddleMan|MiddleMan]] | + | The first time I put it in next to Sharia (there were now 2 examples of religious law) it was reverted and I thought it was because the editor in question believed it would make that section to lengthy, making it less clear. |
| + | |||
| + | Then I added Manu Smriti and put Biblical Law back in (there were now 3 examples of religious law), but only Biblical was removed afterwards, why? | ||
| + | |||
| + | [[User:MiddleMan|MiddleMan]] | ||
Revision as of 23:28, May 11, 2007
Why do certain editors have a problem with the word Biblical law?
The first time I put it in next to Sharia (there were now 2 examples of religious law) it was reverted and I thought it was because the editor in question believed it would make that section to lengthy, making it less clear.
Then I added Manu Smriti and put Biblical Law back in (there were now 3 examples of religious law), but only Biblical was removed afterwards, why?