Difference between revisions of "Talk:Theocracy"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
| Line 6: | Line 6: | ||
[[User:MiddleMan|MiddleMan]] | [[User:MiddleMan|MiddleMan]] | ||
| + | |||
| + | Because some poor innocent (or possibly the FBI) might think that this site agitates for a United States of God's America. All this talk of the right to bear arms on userpages.....the game's afoot! --[[User:Robledo|Robledo]] 19:46, 11 May 2007 (EDT) | ||
Revision as of 23:46, May 11, 2007
Why do certain editors have a problem with the word Biblical law?
The first time I put it in next to Sharia (there were now 2 examples of religious law) it was reverted and I thought it was because the editor in question believed it would make that section to lengthy, making it less clear.
Then I added Manu Smriti and put Biblical Law back in (there were now 3 examples of religious law), but only Biblical was removed afterwards, why?
Because some poor innocent (or possibly the FBI) might think that this site agitates for a United States of God's America. All this talk of the right to bear arms on userpages.....the game's afoot! --Robledo 19:46, 11 May 2007 (EDT)