Difference between revisions of "Journal of Association of American Physicians and Surgeons"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Wikignome72 (talk | contribs) |
Wikignome72 (talk | contribs) (→Notes) |
||
| Line 5: | Line 5: | ||
In 2013, the journal published an article written by MIT professor [[Richard Lindzen]], who wrote: | In 2013, the journal published an article written by MIT professor [[Richard Lindzen]], who wrote: | ||
:"The scientific community is clearly becoming less ambiguous in separating views on warming from totally unreasonable fears for both the planet and mankind. Environmental advocates are responding by making increasingly extreme claims. Politicians are recognizing that these claims are implausible, and are backing away from both the issue and support for climate science."<ref>[http://www.jpands.org/vol18no3/lindzen.pdf Science in the Public Square: Global Climate Alarmism and Historical Precedents]</ref> | :"The scientific community is clearly becoming less ambiguous in separating views on warming from totally unreasonable fears for both the planet and mankind. Environmental advocates are responding by making increasingly extreme claims. Politicians are recognizing that these claims are implausible, and are backing away from both the issue and support for climate science."<ref>[http://www.jpands.org/vol18no3/lindzen.pdf Science in the Public Square: Global Climate Alarmism and Historical Precedents]</ref> | ||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
== External links == | == External links == | ||
Latest revision as of 17:09, October 22, 2019
The Journal of Association of American Physicians and Surgeons (JPandS) is a peer reviewed medical journal of the Association of American Physicians and Surgeons. The journal has been published since 2003. It was formerly called the Medical Sentinel.
Global warming article
In 2013, the journal published an article written by MIT professor Richard Lindzen, who wrote:
- "The scientific community is clearly becoming less ambiguous in separating views on warming from totally unreasonable fears for both the planet and mankind. Environmental advocates are responding by making increasingly extreme claims. Politicians are recognizing that these claims are implausible, and are backing away from both the issue and support for climate science."[1]