Difference between revisions of "Firebrand atheism"

From Conservapedia
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Line 1: Line 1:
 
[[David Silverman]] identifies as a firebrand atheist and defines firebrand atheism as vocally "attacking" humans' "silly" religious beliefs without attacking the individuals themselves.<ref>[https://www.thedailybeast.com/the-case-against-in-your-face-atheism The Case Against In-Your-Face Atheism] by Steve Neumann, ''[[The Daily Beast]]'', 4/14/17</ref>
 
[[David Silverman]] identifies as a firebrand atheist and defines firebrand atheism as vocally "attacking" humans' "silly" religious beliefs without attacking the individuals themselves.<ref>[https://www.thedailybeast.com/the-case-against-in-your-face-atheism The Case Against In-Your-Face Atheism] by Steve Neumann, ''[[The Daily Beast]]'', 4/14/17</ref>
  
−
Firebrand atheism is essentially another term for [[New Atheism]].
+
Firebrand atheism is essentially another term for [[New Atheism]]. In recent years public interest in firebrand atheism has waned and it is essentially dead (see: [[Decline of militant atheism in the West]]).
 
==Notes==
 
==Notes==
 
{{reflist|2}}
 
{{reflist|2}}
 
[[Category:New Atheism]]
 
[[Category:New Atheism]]
 
[[Category: Atheism]]
 
[[Category: Atheism]]

Revision as of 23:50, October 27, 2019

David Silverman identifies as a firebrand atheist and defines firebrand atheism as vocally "attacking" humans' "silly" religious beliefs without attacking the individuals themselves.[1]

Firebrand atheism is essentially another term for New Atheism. In recent years public interest in firebrand atheism has waned and it is essentially dead (see: Decline of militant atheism in the West).

Notes