Difference between revisions of "Talk:Jihad"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Hojimachong (talk | contribs) |
|||
| Line 6: | Line 6: | ||
:::Better now? --<font color="#0000CC" face="Comic Sans MS">[[User:Hojimachong|'''Hojimachong''']]</font><sup><font color="00FFAA">[[User_Talk:Hojimachong|talk]]</font></sup> 01:29, 13 March 2007 (EDT) | :::Better now? --<font color="#0000CC" face="Comic Sans MS">[[User:Hojimachong|'''Hojimachong''']]</font><sup><font color="00FFAA">[[User_Talk:Hojimachong|talk]]</font></sup> 01:29, 13 March 2007 (EDT) | ||
| + | |||
| + | |||
| + | == Mention of Jihad in the Qur'an == | ||
| + | I am not a scholar of the koran, but do these verses specifically mention jihad?[[User:Bohdan|Bohdan]] | ||
Revision as of 21:33, May 13, 2007
Isn't this an Arabic term, used by Muslims? 'Islamic' isn't a language. --WOVcenter 01:10, 13 March 2007 (EDT)
- The language is Arabic, but the idea is uniquely Islamic. It's like, "The Trinity" is an English term, but it is a Christian term in that it almost always refers to the Trinity of the Father, Son, and Holy Spirit. --Hojimachongtalk 01:11, 13 March 2007 (EDT)
- Correct, but Arabic is mentioned nowhere in the article. I merely think it should be mentioned as at least being in Arabic. I just think it's more precise. Without it, it seems to conflate arabic and islam, two things which are not synonyms.--WOVcenter 01:25, 13 March 2007 (EDT)
- Better now? --Hojimachongtalk 01:29, 13 March 2007 (EDT)
Mention of Jihad in the Qur'an
I am not a scholar of the koran, but do these verses specifically mention jihad?Bohdan