Difference between revisions of "Talk:Dinosaur"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
(Courtesy) |
|||
| Line 14: | Line 14: | ||
There, that's a start. --[[User:Horace|Horace]] 20:49, 22 February 2007 (EST) | There, that's a start. --[[User:Horace|Horace]] 20:49, 22 February 2007 (EST) | ||
| + | |||
| + | == Courtesy == | ||
| + | |||
| + | How about some discussion before editing Rich? | ||
Revision as of 02:34, February 23, 2007
How absurd!
What are "Old-Earth Evolutionists"? Is there another kind of "evolutionist"? Is evolutionist a word?
Why is the word "evolved" in inverted commas in the second sentence?
Why are the creationists referred to as scientists whereas the "Old-Earth Evolutionists" are not?
Why does it say that the "Creation scientists" have beliefs based on evidence when it says no such thing about the "Old-Earth Evolutionists"? (who you might think have a better claim to beliefs based on evidence).
Why doesn't the article tell me anything about dinosaurs?
I will be back to do some editing. --Horace 20:27, 22 February 2007 (EST)
There, that's a start. --Horace 20:49, 22 February 2007 (EST)
Courtesy
How about some discussion before editing Rich?