Difference between revisions of "The 1619 Project"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
(Page created) |
(No difference)
|
Revision as of 01:38, December 3, 2019
The 1619 Project is a collection of revisionist history developed by the New York Times to "reframe"(in their words)[1] American history exclusively around slavery and racism.
The work has been roundly criticized, including by prominent historians James Oakes,[2] Gordon S. Wood,[3] Victoria Bynum,[4] and James McPherson.[5]
References
- ↑ The 1619 Project
- ↑ An interview with historian James Oakes on the New York Times’ 1619 Project
- ↑ An interview with historian Gordon Wood on the New York Times’ 1619 Project
- ↑ Historian Victoria Bynum on the inaccuracies of the New York Times 1619 Project
- ↑ An interview with historian James McPherson on the New York Times’ 1619 Project