Changes

Jump to navigation Jump to search
503 bytes added ,  06:56, February 23, 2007
no edit summary
Line 1: Line 1:  
Global warming is a controversial theory that claims that increased atmospheric carbon dioxide (CO<sub>2</sub>) due to industrialization is causing temperatures to increase around the world, to the detriment of our environment.  Al Gore, Vice President under President Clinton from 1992 to 2000, is a high profile advocate of this theory.  Promoters of this theory, including many prominent scientists, call for international treaties, like one proposed in Kyoto, Japan, to limit carbon emissions using a combination of conservation and technological innovation.
 
Global warming is a controversial theory that claims that increased atmospheric carbon dioxide (CO<sub>2</sub>) due to industrialization is causing temperatures to increase around the world, to the detriment of our environment.  Al Gore, Vice President under President Clinton from 1992 to 2000, is a high profile advocate of this theory.  Promoters of this theory, including many prominent scientists, call for international treaties, like one proposed in Kyoto, Japan, to limit carbon emissions using a combination of conservation and technological innovation.
   −
The theory is widely accepted within the scientific community. On February 2, 2007, an internatonal panel of hundreds of scientists and representatives of 113 governments issued a report concluding:
+
The theory is widely accepted within the scientific community despite a lack of any conclusive evidence.<ref>Myths of Global Warming[http://www.ncpa.org/ba/ba230.html]</ref><ref>No Evidence for Global Warming[http://www.heritage.org/Press/Commentary/ed012298b.cfm]</ref> On February 2, 2007, an internatonal panel of hundreds of scientists and representatives of 113 governments issued a report concluding:
 
:The observed widespread warming of the atmosphere and ocean, together with ice-mass loss, support the conclusion that it is extremely unlikely that global climate change of the past 50 years can be explained without external forcing, and very likely that is not due to known natural causes alone."<ref>Borenstein, Seth (2007), "Warming 'Likely' Man-Made, Unstoppable." Associated Press, as published by Forbes[http://www.forbes.com/feeds/ap/2007/02/02/ap3388409.html]</ref>
 
:The observed widespread warming of the atmosphere and ocean, together with ice-mass loss, support the conclusion that it is extremely unlikely that global climate change of the past 50 years can be explained without external forcing, and very likely that is not due to known natural causes alone."<ref>Borenstein, Seth (2007), "Warming 'Likely' Man-Made, Unstoppable." Associated Press, as published by Forbes[http://www.forbes.com/feeds/ap/2007/02/02/ap3388409.html]</ref>
 +
 +
It should be noted that these scientists are largely motivated by a need for grant money in their fields.  Therefore, their work can not be considered unbiased.<ref>FOX News: "On Global Warming: Follow the Money Indeed!" Feb 12, 2007[http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,251458,00.html]</ref>  Also, these scientists are mostly liberal athiests, untroubled by the hubris that man can destroy the Earth which God gave him.<ref>Gloval Warming & Evolution[http://atheism.about.com/b/a/238739.htm]</ref>
    
There are some scientists among the critics of the theory that global warming is caused by human activity.  For example, Dr. Fred Singer observed that "CO<sub>2</sub> changes have lagged about 800 years behind the temperature changes. Global warming has produced more CO<sub>2</sub>, rather than more CO<sub>2</sub> producing global warming."<ref>S. Fred Singer and Dennis T. Avery, "Unstoppable Global Warming: Every 1,500 Years" (Rowman & Littlefield, 2007)</ref>
 
There are some scientists among the critics of the theory that global warming is caused by human activity.  For example, Dr. Fred Singer observed that "CO<sub>2</sub> changes have lagged about 800 years behind the temperature changes. Global warming has produced more CO<sub>2</sub>, rather than more CO<sub>2</sub> producing global warming."<ref>S. Fred Singer and Dennis T. Avery, "Unstoppable Global Warming: Every 1,500 Years" (Rowman & Littlefield, 2007)</ref>
    
[[Liberal]]s would like to see the economy of America destroyed by forcing us to drive solar cars to work, and use geothermal energy to heat our homes.  Global warming is merely a thinly-veiled liberal attempt to destroy capitalism.
 
[[Liberal]]s would like to see the economy of America destroyed by forcing us to drive solar cars to work, and use geothermal energy to heat our homes.  Global warming is merely a thinly-veiled liberal attempt to destroy capitalism.
  −
Conservatives would like to see God's creation destroyed by forcing us to drive SUVs to work, and use fossil fuels to heat our un-insulated, drafty homes.  Global warming is a widely accepted phenomenon.
      
----
 
----
    
'''References:'''  <references/>
 
'''References:'''  <references/>
11

edits

Navigation menu