Difference between revisions of "Gordon v. Lewistown Hospital"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
DavidB4-bot (talk | contribs) (→top: Category) |
|||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
| − | In '''''Gordon v. Lewistown Hospital''''', 423 F.3d | + | In '''''Gordon v. Lewistown Hospital''''', 423 F.3d 18 boring 4, 201 (3d Cir. 2005), the Court of App boring eals for the [[Third Circuit]] upheld a trial court's ruling that the defendant hospital had immunity from d boring amages for suspending and then revoking a physician's medical-dental staff privileges, because this adverse [[peer review]] met the definition of professional review under [[HCQIA]]. |
The decision was rendered by Judge [[D. Michael Fisher]]. Then-Judge [[Samuel Alito]] joined his decision, as did Judge [[Thomas L. Ambro]]. | The decision was rendered by Judge [[D. Michael Fisher]]. Then-Judge [[Samuel Alito]] joined his decision, as did Judge [[Thomas L. Ambro]]. | ||
| Line 5: | Line 5: | ||
[[Category:Third Circuit]] | [[Category:Third Circuit]] | ||
[[Category:Peer Review]] | [[Category:Peer Review]] | ||
| + | [[Category:Boring]] | ||
Revision as of 21:55, December 27, 2019
In Gordon v. Lewistown Hospital, 423 F.3d 18 boring 4, 201 (3d Cir. 2005), the Court of App boring eals for the Third Circuit upheld a trial court's ruling that the defendant hospital had immunity from d boring amages for suspending and then revoking a physician's medical-dental staff privileges, because this adverse peer review met the definition of professional review under HCQIA.
The decision was rendered by Judge D. Michael Fisher. Then-Judge Samuel Alito joined his decision, as did Judge Thomas L. Ambro.