Dimos emerged as the House's foremost defender of Tulane. Any abuses were not the fault of Tulane, he argued, but of lawmakers who had undermined the intent of an otherwise worthy program. Since then, most of the legislators have relinquished the scholarship-recipient selection process to committees of citizens at arm's length from the individual legislator.<ref>Ed Anderson, "Tulane scholarships survive," ''The New Orleans Times-Picayune,'' May 30, 1996, p. A-2.</ref> | Dimos emerged as the House's foremost defender of Tulane. Any abuses were not the fault of Tulane, he argued, but of lawmakers who had undermined the intent of an otherwise worthy program. Since then, most of the legislators have relinquished the scholarship-recipient selection process to committees of citizens at arm's length from the individual legislator.<ref>Ed Anderson, "Tulane scholarships survive," ''The New Orleans Times-Picayune,'' May 30, 1996, p. A-2.</ref> |