Difference between revisions of "Talk:Dinosaur"
| Line 22: | Line 22: | ||
Why was all information based on the Creation worldview removed from this article? I thought this was precisely the sort of anti-Christian bias that Conservapedia was created to combat. Are people from Wikipedia trying to undermine this site? Well, nevermind; those interested to hear non-PC discussions of [http://creationwiki.org/Dinosaur dinosaurs] and Origins in general are welcome to come to [http://creationwiki.org/Main_Page CreationWiki] instead. [[User:Rich P|Dr. Richard Paley]] 01:41, 23 February 2007 (EST) | Why was all information based on the Creation worldview removed from this article? I thought this was precisely the sort of anti-Christian bias that Conservapedia was created to combat. Are people from Wikipedia trying to undermine this site? Well, nevermind; those interested to hear non-PC discussions of [http://creationwiki.org/Dinosaur dinosaurs] and Origins in general are welcome to come to [http://creationwiki.org/Main_Page CreationWiki] instead. [[User:Rich P|Dr. Richard Paley]] 01:41, 23 February 2007 (EST) | ||
| + | |||
| + | :I removed this information because it does not speak for all Christians, and none of the sources even claimed to speak for most Christians. | ||
Revision as of 20:27, February 23, 2007
How absurd!
What are "Old-Earth Evolutionists"? Is there another kind of "evolutionist"? Is evolutionist a word?
Why is the word "evolved" in inverted commas in the second sentence?
Why are the creationists referred to as scientists whereas the "Old-Earth Evolutionists" are not?
Why does it say that the "Creation scientists" have beliefs based on evidence when it says no such thing about the "Old-Earth Evolutionists"? (who you might think have a better claim to beliefs based on evidence).
Why doesn't the article tell me anything about dinosaurs?
I will be back to do some editing. --Horace 20:27, 22 February 2007 (EST)
There, that's a start. --Horace 20:49, 22 February 2007 (EST)
Courtesy
How about some discussion before editing Rich? --Horace 21:45, 22 February 2007 (EST)
Anti-Christian Bias
Why was all information based on the Creation worldview removed from this article? I thought this was precisely the sort of anti-Christian bias that Conservapedia was created to combat. Are people from Wikipedia trying to undermine this site? Well, nevermind; those interested to hear non-PC discussions of dinosaurs and Origins in general are welcome to come to CreationWiki instead. Dr. Richard Paley 01:41, 23 February 2007 (EST)
- I removed this information because it does not speak for all Christians, and none of the sources even claimed to speak for most Christians.