Difference between revisions of "Talk:Loving v. Virginia"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
m (Added Protect tag) |
|||
| Line 4: | Line 4: | ||
:Sorry, but in the above comment, you lost me. [[User:RobS|RobS]] 17:37, 13 May 2007 (EDT) | :Sorry, but in the above comment, you lost me. [[User:RobS|RobS]] 17:37, 13 May 2007 (EDT) | ||
:Me too. Huh?--[[User:Britinme|Britinme]] 18:00, 13 May 2007 (EDT) | :Me too. Huh?--[[User:Britinme|Britinme]] 18:00, 13 May 2007 (EDT) | ||
| + | |||
| + | Didn't this article used to be different? There used to be actual legal analysis here, but I can't find it in the revision history.-'''Speak[http://www.conservapedia.com/User_talk:SpeakerOfTheDead er]''' 11:15, 15 May 2007 (EDT) | ||
Revision as of 15:15, May 15, 2007
| ! | Due to the controversial nature of this article, it has been locked by the Administrators to prevent edit wars or vandalism. Sysops, please do not unlock it without first consulting the protecting sysop. |
|
How typical. Scream about a homosexual agenda, but when someone plays the same game and uses "conservative agenda" you get your panties in a bunch. There is nothing wuie like being the object of someone's suspicion, distrust, and revilement. Prof0705 17:04, 13 May 2007 (EDT)
- Sorry, but in the above comment, you lost me. RobS 17:37, 13 May 2007 (EDT)
- Me too. Huh?--Britinme 18:00, 13 May 2007 (EDT)
Didn't this article used to be different? There used to be actual legal analysis here, but I can't find it in the revision history.-Speaker 11:15, 15 May 2007 (EDT)