The case [[Griswold v. Connecticut]] emerged as a result of changing sexual mores, and a conservative reaction against this change. Specifically, Connecticut had forbidden the sale of contraception materials to married couples. A married couple had received condoms from Griswold, the petitioner-physician in the case, who was indicted as an accomplice to the usage of contraceptives.
+
The case [[Griswold v. Connecticut]] emerged as a result of changing sexual mores, and a conservative reaction against this change. Specifically, Connecticut had forbidden by statute the sale of contraception materials to married couples. A married couple had received condoms from Griswold, the petitioner-physician in the case, who was indicted as an accomplice to the usage of contraceptives. The case came to the Supreme Court, where the Court struck down the Connecticut statute as abridging a fundamental right to privacy in the "marital bedroom."
+
+
Specifically, the Court stated, building on the "enumerated/implied" distinction set forth in early Supreme Court jurisprudence<refer>See e.g. McCulloch v. Maryland.</ref>, that the enumerated rights of the Bill of Rights emanate "penumbras," filled with subsidiary rights that give meaning to the enumerated rights, and without which the enumerated rights would have no meaning. The Court wrote that the Fourth Amendment guarantee of freedom from search & seizure, the First Amendment guarantee of freedom of expression, and others, all accumulated to prove a right to freedom from intrusion into a couple's intimate affairs. By regulating conduct in the bedroom, the state had gone too far, and run afoul of this fundamental right.