Difference between revisions of "Talk:Theory of relativity"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
(Great article) |
(Special and general relativity) |
||
| Line 7: | Line 7: | ||
And rather than simply be sarcastic, I will work on a better article over the weekend. One that actually discusses the science. | And rather than simply be sarcastic, I will work on a better article over the weekend. One that actually discusses the science. | ||
| + | |||
| + | == Special and general relativity == | ||
| + | |||
| + | This article seems to combine the two. They are different ideas and need to be distinguished. [[User:JoshuaZ|JoshuaZ]] 19:21, 24 February 2007 (EST) | ||
Revision as of 00:21, February 25, 2007
Great article
1) Superb avoidance of difficult science in a scientific article. Best not to be confusing. 2) Nice attention on Eddington rather than the theory itself. 3) Good mind reading regarding Eddington's dreams. 4) Nice work ignoring the facts about things that have been inventing using GR such as GPS
And rather than simply be sarcastic, I will work on a better article over the weekend. One that actually discusses the science.
Special and general relativity
This article seems to combine the two. They are different ideas and need to be distinguished. JoshuaZ 19:21, 24 February 2007 (EST)