| Line 23: |
Line 23: |
| | }} | | }} |
| | | | |
| − | '''Robert "Bob" Menendez''' (born January 1, 1954) is the senior [[United States]] [[Senator]] from [[New Jersey]] and a member of the [[Democratic Party]]. After being appointed to fill the vacant Senate seat left by [[Governor]] [[Jon Corzine]], Menendez was elected to a term in his own right with 53% of the vote in 2006. He has voted with his Democrat colleagues 97.2% of the time.<ref>[http://projects.washingtonpost.com/congress/members/m000639/ Source: ''The Washington Post'']</ref> Menendez was chairman of the [[Democratic Senatorial Campaign Committee]] from 2009-2011, during which Democrats lost a net of six Senate seats. | + | '''Robert "Bob" Menendez''' (born January 1, 1954) is the senior [[United States]] [[Senator]] from [[New Jersey]] and a member of the [[Democratic Party]]. After being appointed to fill the vacant Senate seat left by [[Governor]] [[Jon Corzine]], Menendez was elected to a term in his own right with 53% of the vote in 2006. He has voted with his Democrat colleagues 97.2% of the time.<ref>[http://projects.washingtonpost.com/congress/members/m000639/ Source: ''The Washington Post'']</ref> Menendez was chairman of the [[Democratic Senatorial Campaign Committee]] from 2009–2011, during which Democrats lost a net of six Senate seats. |
| | | | |
| | Previously he served as [[Mayor]] of Union City, New Jersey, and then as a U.S. Representative for New Jersey's 13th congressional district. | | Previously he served as [[Mayor]] of Union City, New Jersey, and then as a U.S. Representative for New Jersey's 13th congressional district. |
| Line 44: |
Line 44: |
| | Menendez appealed the decision on April 4, 2010.<ref name=sconjpetition>Hurlbut T, "[http://www.examiner.com/essex-county-elections-2010-in-newark/menendez-appeals-recall-decision-to-nj-supreme-court Menendez appeals recall decision to NJ Supreme Court]," <http://www.examiner.com/Newark>, 5 April 2010</ref> The Supreme Court of New Jersey accepted the "petition for certification" and asked for briefs on an accelerated briefing schedule.<ref name=briefsked>Hurlbut T, "[http://www.examiner.com/essex-county-elections-2010-in-newark/nj-supremes-accelerate-briefing-sked-on-menendez-recall NJ Supremes accelerate briefing sked on Menendez recall]," <http://www.examiner.com/Newark>, 8 April 2010</ref> The case went to oral argument on May 25<ref name=oralsupreme>Hurlbut T, "[http://www.examiner.com/essex-county-elections-2010-in-newark/oral-arguments-conclude-menendez-recall-case Oral arguments conclude in Menendez recall case]," <http://www.examiner.com/Newark>, 26 May 2010</ref>—before only six Justices and an empty chair. (Christie has earlier refused to reappoint Associate Justice [[John E. Wallace]] to a tenured position on the Court, and the New Jersey Senate, taking exception to Christie's non-reappointment of a sitting Justice who did not stand accused of moral turpitude, refused to hold hearings on the confirmation of a permanent successor to Wallace, and continues so to refuse to this day.) | | Menendez appealed the decision on April 4, 2010.<ref name=sconjpetition>Hurlbut T, "[http://www.examiner.com/essex-county-elections-2010-in-newark/menendez-appeals-recall-decision-to-nj-supreme-court Menendez appeals recall decision to NJ Supreme Court]," <http://www.examiner.com/Newark>, 5 April 2010</ref> The Supreme Court of New Jersey accepted the "petition for certification" and asked for briefs on an accelerated briefing schedule.<ref name=briefsked>Hurlbut T, "[http://www.examiner.com/essex-county-elections-2010-in-newark/nj-supremes-accelerate-briefing-sked-on-menendez-recall NJ Supremes accelerate briefing sked on Menendez recall]," <http://www.examiner.com/Newark>, 8 April 2010</ref> The case went to oral argument on May 25<ref name=oralsupreme>Hurlbut T, "[http://www.examiner.com/essex-county-elections-2010-in-newark/oral-arguments-conclude-menendez-recall-case Oral arguments conclude in Menendez recall case]," <http://www.examiner.com/Newark>, 26 May 2010</ref>—before only six Justices and an empty chair. (Christie has earlier refused to reappoint Associate Justice [[John E. Wallace]] to a tenured position on the Court, and the New Jersey Senate, taking exception to Christie's non-reappointment of a sitting Justice who did not stand accused of moral turpitude, refused to hold hearings on the confirmation of a permanent successor to Wallace, and continues so to refuse to this day.) |
| | | | |
| − | On November 18, 2010, the Supreme Court held, 4-2, that a United States Senator was ''not'' subject to recall.<ref name=reversed>Hurlbut T, "[http://www.examiner.com/essex-county-elections-2010-in-newark/nj-supremes-declare-recall-unconstitutional NJ Supremes declare recall unconstitutional]," <http://www.examiner.com/Newark>, 18 Nov 2010.</ref> The arguments that the Court used are difficult to follow, and amount to an assertion that the US Constitution's silence on recall, after the [[Articles of Confederation]] had made recall an explicit right, constituted a denial of the right of recall. Justices [[Roberto A. Rivera-Soto]] and [[Helen E. Hoens]] stingingly dissented, saying that "a dark day" had fallen on the Court after it had, in essence, declared part of New Jersey's own Constitution unconstitutional. | + | On November 18, 2010, the Supreme Court held, 4–2, that a United States Senator was ''not'' subject to recall.<ref name=reversed>Hurlbut T, "[http://www.examiner.com/essex-county-elections-2010-in-newark/nj-supremes-declare-recall-unconstitutional NJ Supremes declare recall unconstitutional]," <http://www.examiner.com/Newark>, 18 Nov 2010.</ref> The arguments that the Court used are difficult to follow, and amount to an assertion that the US Constitution's silence on recall, after the [[Articles of Confederation]] had made recall an explicit right, constituted a denial of the right of recall. Justices [[Roberto A. Rivera-Soto]] and [[Helen E. Hoens]] stingingly dissented, saying that "a dark day" had fallen on the Court after it had, in essence, declared part of New Jersey's own Constitution unconstitutional. |
| | | | |
| | The Recall Committee and its lead counsel ([[User:Aschlafly|Andrew L. Schlafly]]) have now announced their intention to petition for ''certiorari'' to the [[United States Supreme Court]].<ref name=scotus>Hurlbut T, "[http://www.examiner.com/essex-county-elections-2010-in-newark/menendez-recall-committee-will-petition-us-supremes Menendez recall committee will petition US Supremes]," <http://www.examiner.com/Newark>, 28 Dec 2010.</ref> | | The Recall Committee and its lead counsel ([[User:Aschlafly|Andrew L. Schlafly]]) have now announced their intention to petition for ''certiorari'' to the [[United States Supreme Court]].<ref name=scotus>Hurlbut T, "[http://www.examiner.com/essex-county-elections-2010-in-newark/menendez-recall-committee-will-petition-us-supremes Menendez recall committee will petition US Supremes]," <http://www.examiner.com/Newark>, 28 Dec 2010.</ref> |