Difference between revisions of "Talk:Anti-Flag"

From Conservapedia
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(Delete?)
Line 4: Line 4:
  
 
The subject matter is hardly encyclopedic, and the use of the term "pro-choice" is highly suspect.  This article seems to be counter-productive to the purposes of a conservative encyclopedia.  [[User:HeartOfGold|HeartOfGold]] 00:10, 17 May 2007 (EDT)
 
The subject matter is hardly encyclopedic, and the use of the term "pro-choice" is highly suspect.  This article seems to be counter-productive to the purposes of a conservative encyclopedia.  [[User:HeartOfGold|HeartOfGold]] 00:10, 17 May 2007 (EDT)
 +
:They're one of the most prolific (if not ''the'' most prolific) punk-rock bands ever. If any band is notable, it's them. --<font color="#0000CC" face="Comic Sans MS">[[User:Hojimachong|'''Hojimachong''']]</font><sup><font color="00FFAA">[[User_Talk:Hojimachong|talk]]</font></sup> 00:15, 17 May 2007 (EDT)

Revision as of 04:15, May 17, 2007

I don't like the merge idea; there are plenty of bands with articles, and Anti-Flag is much more notable than many of them. --Hojimachongtalk 20:28, 28 April 2007 (EDT)

Delete?

The subject matter is hardly encyclopedic, and the use of the term "pro-choice" is highly suspect. This article seems to be counter-productive to the purposes of a conservative encyclopedia. HeartOfGold 00:10, 17 May 2007 (EDT)

They're one of the most prolific (if not the most prolific) punk-rock bands ever. If any band is notable, it's them. --Hojimachongtalk 00:15, 17 May 2007 (EDT)