Changes

142 bytes removed ,  04:17, February 25, 2007
no edit summary
Line 1: Line 1:  
== Added material about Dover Trial ==
 
== Added material about Dover Trial ==
   −
Here is what I added:  However, according the conservative source WorldNetDaily the judge in the ruling was far from impartial.  The WorldNetDaily wrote, "A historic judicial ruling against intelligent design theory hailed as a "broad, stinging rebuke" and a "masterpiece of wit, scholarship and clear thinking" actually was "cut and pasted" from a brief by ACLU lawyers and includes many of their provable errors, contends the Seattle-based Discovery Institute." [http://www.worldnetdaily.com/news/article.asp?ARTICLE_ID=53330] [[User:Conservative|Conservative]] 23:12, 24 February 2007 (EST)conservative
+
Here is what I added:  "However, the conservative publication WorldNetDaily wrote, "A historic judicial ruling against intelligent design theory hailed as a "broad, stinging rebuke" and a "masterpiece of wit, scholarship and clear thinking" actually was "cut and pasted" from a brief by [[ACLU]] lawyers and includes many of their provable errors, contends the Seattle-based Discovery Institute." [http://www.worldnetdaily.com/news/article.asp?ARTICLE_ID=53330] "
Irenaeus, Siteadmin, Check users, oversight, Administrators
351,749

edits