User talk:Ashens

Thanks for your interesting entries.

I'm not sure what you mean by saying that Bush's reelection in 2004 was controversial.--Aschlafly 00:56, 24 February 2007 (EST)

Many people assert that Bush "stole" the election because of voting fraud. They cite discrepancies between polling and actual vote counts. I don't take it seriously, but apparently many liberals do. This is a popular article, though I didn't know how to include it in the page on Bush. http://www.nwcreation.net/evolutionfraud.html--Ashens 01:03 24 February 2007 (EST)

OK, but sore losers are common. I'm not sure sour grapes by liberals in 2004 makes the election outcome controversial. Is JFK's victory in 1960 also described by liberals as "controversial"? Tell you what, I'll just go ahead and make an edit to George W. Bush. Thanks again for your interesting entries and edits, which are superb.--Aschlafly 01:26, 24 February 2007 (EST)

Thanks for the compliment! As for the George W. Bush entry, hopefully other users will provide some input on whether or not "controversy" is warranted.--Ashens 01:37 24 February 2007 (EST)

Relativity edit

[1] I don't see what is parody about that edit (in fact, it looks to me like one of the few things on that page that makes sense). JoshuaZ 19:02, 24 February 2007 (EST)

While there are many jokes revolving around Relativity, it's not used to support relative morality. The part that I removed was an attempt to parody Christians' genuine rebuttal of evolutionary moral standards. Evolution implies relative morality and so creationists attack the unproven theory by demonstrating why their moral standards are flawed. Evolutionists don't like it when creationists refute this part of their so-called science and so I think they're attempting to mock the argument by applying the same reasoning to Relativity.--Ashens 10:17 25 February 2007 (EST)