Changes

In Stark's list of 52 top scientific contributors,<ref name="Origins">Williams, Alex,[http://www.creationontheweb.com/content/view/1581/ The biblical origins of science], ''Journal of Creation'' 18(2):49–52, August 2004.</ref> only one ([[Edmund Halley]]) was a skeptic and another ([[Paracelsus]]) was a [[pantheism|pantheist]].

In Stark's list of 52 top scientific contributors,<ref name="Origins">Williams, Alex,[http://www.creationontheweb.com/content/view/1581/ The biblical origins of science], ''Journal of Creation'' 18(2):49–52, August 2004.</ref> only one ([[Edmund Halley]]) was a skeptic and another ([[Paracelsus]]) was a [[pantheism|pantheist]].

The other 50 were Christians, 30 of whom could be characterized as being devout Christians.<ref name="Origins" />

The other 50 were Christians, 30 of whom could be characterized as being devout Christians.<ref name="Origins" />

Stark believes that the [[Enlightenment]] was a ploy by "militant atheists" to claim credit for the rise of science.<ref name="goliath.ecnext.com">http://goliath.ecnext.com/coms2/gi_0199-3274629/False-conflict-Christianity-is-not.html</ref>

Stark believes that the [[Enlightenment]] was a ploy by "militant atheists" to claim credit for the rise of science.<ref name="goliath.ecnext.com">http://goliath.ecnext.com/coms2/gi_0199-3274629/False-conflict-Christianity-is-not.html (archived link [https://web.archive.org/web/20071209064029/http://goliath.ecnext.com/coms2/gi_0199-3274629/False-conflict-Christianity-is-not.html here])</ref>

In ''False conflict: Christianity is not only compatible with Science - it created it''. Stark writes:

In ''False conflict: Christianity is not only compatible with Science - it created it''. Stark writes: