Changes

::*and moving comments "yay" to the now named "Protagonist" section, and comments "nay" to the now-named "Antagonist" section of the Debate. That should streamline the whole page.

::*and moving comments "yay" to the now named "Protagonist" section, and comments "nay" to the now-named "Antagonist" section of the Debate. That should streamline the whole page.

::If it's promptly reverted afterward I won't be at all surprised, even if the revised layout '''''is''''' according to the form Conservative insisted should be maintained for a debate page. If it is, I won't stick around to contest it. A reversion would only prove that revision of the page into the form of a fair debate clearly stated without obscuring the topic is unacceptable to someone. <br> '''''Nuff said!''''' (too much!) --[[User:IndependentSkeptic|IndependentSkeptic]] ([[User talk:IndependentSkeptic|talk]]) 15:11, 31 August 2020 (EDT)

::If it's promptly reverted afterward I won't be at all surprised, even if the revised layout '''''is''''' according to the form Conservative insisted should be maintained for a debate page. If it is, I won't stick around to contest it. A reversion would only prove that revision of the page into the form of a fair debate clearly stated without obscuring the topic is unacceptable to someone. <br> '''''Nuff said!''''' (too much!) --[[User:IndependentSkeptic|IndependentSkeptic]] ([[User talk:IndependentSkeptic|talk]]) 15:11, 31 August 2020 (EDT)

::That presents a problem, not against you personally, but setting a new precedent by allowing editors to rearrange other editors contributions in a Debate format. Context can often be lost. The problem may be with debate rules and formats, which I would encourage developing uniform standards and guidelines (here is an excellant example where the 90/10 rule discourages cooperation between editors).

:::That presents a problem, not against you personally, but setting a new precedent by allowing editors to rearrange other editors contributions in a Debate format. Context can often be lost. The problem may be with debate rules and formats, which I would encourage developing uniform standards and guidelines (here is an excellant example where the 90/10 rule discourages cooperation between editors).

::As to the specific debate page in question, I'd encourage you to engage on the talk page there with suggestions before making an substantial revisions to the mainspace. [[User:RobSmith|RobS]]^{[[User talk:RobSmith|Trump 2Q2Q]]} 15:25, 31 August 2020 (EDT)

:::As to the specific debate page in question, I'd encourage you to engage on the talk page there with suggestions before making an substantial revisions to the mainspace. [[User:RobSmith|RobS]]^{[[User talk:RobSmith|Trump 2Q2Q]]} 15:25, 31 August 2020 (EDT)