Changes

no edit summary
Line 217: Line 217:     
:::::Pity poor me! I've had to balance the role of being a neutral Moderator/Sysop and debate participant all the while developing debate rules at the same time over three debates; whereas you have been able to use the same time to concentrate the full weigh of your hatred and venom against me while filling in the gaps of your lame arguments with redundant spam. It's not fair. [[User:RobSmith|RobS]]<sup>[[User talk:RobSmith|Trump 2Q2Q]]</sup> 17:36, 31 August 2020 (EDT)
 
:::::Pity poor me! I've had to balance the role of being a neutral Moderator/Sysop and debate participant all the while developing debate rules at the same time over three debates; whereas you have been able to use the same time to concentrate the full weigh of your hatred and venom against me while filling in the gaps of your lame arguments with redundant spam. It's not fair. [[User:RobSmith|RobS]]<sup>[[User talk:RobSmith|Trump 2Q2Q]]</sup> 17:36, 31 August 2020 (EDT)
 +
::::::"''Hatred and venom!''" You don't even recognize yourself! Your '''''own''''' comments on the debate page have been quite vicious! No prizes for diplomacy there. Comments like "garbage spam", "Satanic", "gobbledygook", "antichrist". They're all there, and more! And your vindictive deletion of abundant evidence from the Bible against statements you have made that were lies! And when an attempt was made to correct you on what might charitably be called "[[falsehood]]s" rather than going so far as saying they are deliberate lies you retaliated. I know what you are. Anyone with a modicum of good sense can see it. You're a proven '''[[bigot]]'''. The evident hatred mentioned as characteristic of a [[Double standard]] is clearly evident in your inveighing against the ''Catechism of the Catholic Church''—which you don't seem to have actually read in its entirety. (TLDR?) You've closed your mind and heart to the truth—only stubbornly maintaining your own [[Prejudice]] in answer to clear explanations from the Bible and your refusal to acknowledge responses explaining that you are not truthful regarding actual Catholic doctrine, by continuing the same attack of [[misrepresentation]] using the [[Straw man fallacy]] in a classic example of the [[Fallacy of invincible ignorance]] when the evidence disproving your assertions is not acknowledged by you, as if no evidence was presented. You don't belong on a Christian site. --[[User:IndependentSkeptic|IndependentSkeptic]] ([[User talk:IndependentSkeptic|talk]]) 18:27, 31 August 2020 (EDT)
SkipCaptcha
951

edits