Changes

m
Line 235: Line 235:  
:::::::::::From my perspective, you (a) do not cite any or not enough CCC for other debaters and readers to view and criticize; leading to (b) a gross misuse and misrepresentation of the Bible for readers and debaters to compare and criticize.  
 
:::::::::::From my perspective, you (a) do not cite any or not enough CCC for other debaters and readers to view and criticize; leading to (b) a gross misuse and misrepresentation of the Bible for readers and debaters to compare and criticize.  
 
:::::::::::You need to cite more CCC and less scripture; others, that is readers and debaters, have to take '''''your''''' word for ''your'' claim that the Bible supports catechism, yet you provide no evidence.  This makes for a non-logical debate.
 
:::::::::::You need to cite more CCC and less scripture; others, that is readers and debaters, have to take '''''your''''' word for ''your'' claim that the Bible supports catechism, yet you provide no evidence.  This makes for a non-logical debate.
−
:::::::::::IOWs, you complaint is without merit. [[User:RobSmith|RobS]]<sup>[[User talk:RobSmith|Trump 2Q2Q]]</sup> 20:03, 31 August 2020 (EDT)
+
:::::::::::IOWs, your complaint is without merit. [[User:RobSmith|RobS]]<sup>[[User talk:RobSmith|Trump 2Q2Q]]</sup> 20:03, 31 August 2020 (EDT)
 
===Anyways....===
 
===Anyways....===
 
I'm hammering out Debate Rules. Any suggestions for alternative wording or additional Rules?
 
I'm hammering out Debate Rules. Any suggestions for alternative wording or additional Rules?
Block, Siteadmin, SkipCaptcha, Upload, Automoderated users, delete, edit, move, nsTeam2RO, nsTeam2RW, nsTeam2_talkRO, nsTeam2_talkRW, protect, rollback, Administrators, template
295,031

edits