Difference between revisions of "Talk:Bostock v. Clayton County"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
I apologize, I originally thought that Aimee Stephens was biologically born female. I guess I was wrong. So thank you for correcting my use of addressing him as a female. | I apologize, I originally thought that Aimee Stephens was biologically born female. I guess I was wrong. So thank you for correcting my use of addressing him as a female. | ||
| − | Does the first paragraph need more support for its claims? I agree with the information, but should there be | + | Does the first paragraph need more support for its claims? I agree with the information, but should there be more foundation given for why the information is true? Such as, why is the ruling illegal? |
Revision as of 17:23, October 22, 2020
I apologize, I originally thought that Aimee Stephens was biologically born female. I guess I was wrong. So thank you for correcting my use of addressing him as a female.
Does the first paragraph need more support for its claims? I agree with the information, but should there be more foundation given for why the information is true? Such as, why is the ruling illegal?